Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32160866›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Phylogeny of teleost connexins reveals highly inconsistent intra- and interspecies use of nomenclature and misassemblies in recent teleost chromosome assemblies.

Svein-Ole Mikalsen, Marni Tausen, Sunnvør Í Kongsstovu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Connexins during 500 Million Years-From Cyclostomes to Mammals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Svein-Ole MikalsenFaculty of Science and Technology, University of the Faroe Islands, Vestara Bryggja 15, FO-100, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands. sveinom@setur.fo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7128-4464
Marni TausenFaculty of Science and Technology, University of the Faroe Islands, Vestara Bryggja 15, FO-100, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0694-9199
Sunnvør Í KongsstovuFaculty of Science and Technology, University of the Faroe Islands, Vestara Bryggja 15, FO-100, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6631-2347
University of the Faroe Islands · FO

Funding

Danish Innovation Fund NAFaroese Research Council NAFisheries Research Fund of the Faroe Islands NAStatoil Føroyar NAThe Faroese Pelagic Organisation NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on an initial collecting of database sequences from the gap junction protein gene family (also called connexin genes) in a few teleosts, the naming of these sequences appeared variable. The reasons could be (i) that the structure in this family is variable across teleosts, or (ii) unfortunate naming. Rather clear rules for the naming of genes in fish and mammals have been outlined by nomenclature committees, including the naming of orthologous and ohnologous genes. We therefore analyzed the connexin gene family in teleosts in more detail. We covered the range of divergence times in teleosts (eel, Atlantic herring, zebrafish, Atlantic cod, three-spined stickleback, Japanese pufferfish and spotted pufferfish; listed from early divergence to late divergence).

resultsThe gene family pattern of connexin genes is similar across the analyzed teleosts. However, (i) several nomenclature systems are used, (ii) specific orthologous groups contain genes that are named differently in different species, (iii) several distinct genes have the same name in a species, and (iv) some genes have incorrect names. The latter includes a human connexin pseudogene, claimed as GJA4P, but which in reality is Cx39.2P (a delta subfamily gene often called GJD2like). We point out the ohnologous pairs of genes in teleosts, and we suggest a more consistent nomenclature following the outlined rules from the nomenclature committees. We further show that connexin sequences can indicate some errors in two high-quality chromosome assemblies that became available very recently.

conclusionsMinimal consistency exists in the present practice of naming teleost connexin genes. A consistent and unified nomenclature would be an advantage for future automatic annotations and would make various types of subsequent genetic analyses easier. Additionally, roughly 5% of the connexin sequences point out misassemblies in the new high-quality chromosome assemblies from herring and cod.

Indexed as

AnimalsConnexinsFishesFish ProteinsMultigene FamilyPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNATerminology as TopicConnexinsFish ProteinsConnexinsGenome duplicationMammalsNomenclatureOhnologsOrthologsParalogsPhylogenetic treesTeleosts

Identifiers

PMID32160866
PMCPMC7066803
OpenAlexW3011813953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.