Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32160755›Full record

Trial reportAIDS research and human retroviruses2020

Participant Perspectives in an HIV Cure-Related Trial Conducted Exclusively in Women in the United States: Results from AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5366.

Karine Dubé, Lara Hosey, Kate Starr, Liz Barr, David Evans, Erin Hoffman, Danielle M Campbell, Jane Simoni, Jeremy Sugarman, John Sauceda and 7 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The HIV Reservoir and Immune Landscape Across the Life Course of Women: Implications for Cure Strategies.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Karine DubéUNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lara HoseySocial and Scientific Systems (S-3), Silver Spring, Maryland.
Kate StarrACTG Community Scientific Sub-Committee, Columbus, Ohio and Baltimore, Maryland.
Liz BarrACTG Community Scientific Sub-Committee, Columbus, Ohio and Baltimore, Maryland.
David EvansDelaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), New York City, New York.
Erin HoffmanInstitute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Danielle M CampbellCharles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California.
Jane SimoniDepartment of Global Health and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Jeremy SugarmanJohns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland.
John SaucedaDivision of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Brandon BrownDepartment of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California.
Karen L DiepstraUNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Catherine GodfreyHIV Research Branch, National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Daniel R KuritzkesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
David A WohlInstitute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Rajesh GandhiMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eileen ScullyJohn Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Leadership and Operations Center (LOC), AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG); LOC 1/UM1AI068636 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph J Eron, RAJESH T GANDHI · 2011 to 2026
$1073.1M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC), AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG)UM1AI068634 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Marlene Ann Cooper, Michael David Hughes · 2011 to 2026
$246.6M
University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EDWIN ROBERTO ORELLANA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALLORY O JOHNSON · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
Pilot Integration of Participant-Centered Outcomes in HIV Cure Research in the United States: Implications for Ethical ConductR21MH118120 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DUBE, KARINE · 2019 to 2020
$566k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068634NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068636NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH118120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women remain underrepresented in HIV research. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 5366 study was the first HIV cure-related trial conducted exclusively in women. Our multidisciplinary team integrated participant-centered reports into the ACTG 5366 protocol to elicit their perspectives. We nested mixed-methods surveys at the enrollment and final study visits to assess ACTG 5366 participants' perceptions and experiences. Of 31 participants enrolled in the ACTG 5366, 29 study agreed to complete the entry questionnaire and 27 completed the exit survey. The majority of study participants were nonwhite. We identified societal and personal motivators for participation, understanding of risks and benefits, and minor misconceptions among some trial participants. Stigma was pervasive for several women who joined the study, and served as a motivator for study participation. Reimbursements to defray costs of study participation were reported to facilitate involvement in the trial by about one-third of participants. Almost all respondents reported positive experiences participating in the ACTG 5366 trial. The ACTG 5366 study showed that it is possible to recruit and retain women in HIV cure-related research and to embed participant-centered outcomes at strategic time points during the study. The findings could help in the design, implementation, recruitment, and retention of women in HIV cure-related research and highlight the value of assessing psychosocial factors in HIV cure-related research participation.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPatient ParticipationQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentSocial StigmaTamoxifenUnited StatesVorinostatAnti-HIV AgentsTamoxifenVorinostatbehavioral sciencesHIV cure-related researchsocial sciencestaxomifenvorinostatwomen living with HIV

Identifiers

PMID32160755
PMCPMC7185351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.