ArticlePloS one2020
Topical dual-probe staining using quantum dot-labeled antibodies for identifying tumor biomarkers in fresh specimens.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperspectral imaging for tumor resection guidance in surgery: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Evaluating Receptor-Specific Fresh Specimen Staining for Tumor Margin Detection in Clinical Breast Specimens.Molecular imaging and biology · 2023Article
- Dual probe difference specimen imaging for prostate cancer margin assessment.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- TRIPODD: a Novel Fluorescence Imaging Platform for In Situ Quantification of Drug Distribution and Therapeutic Response.Molecular imaging and biology · 2021Article
- Hyperspectral imaging and spectral unmixing for improving whole-body fluorescence cryo-imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRapid, intra-operative identification of tumor tissue in the margins of excised specimens has become an important focus in the pursuit of reducing re-excision rates, especially for breast conserving surgery. Dual-probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) is an emerging approach that uses the difference in uptake/clearance kinetics between a pair of fluorescently-labeled stains, one targeted to a biomarker-of-interest and the other an untargeted isotype, to reveal receptor-specific images of the specimen. Previous studies using antibodies labeled with either enhanced Raman particles or organic fluorophores have shown promising tumor vs. normal diagnostic performance. Yet, the unique properties of quantum dot-labeled antibody complexes (QDACs), which provide spectrally-distinct fluorescence emission from a common excitation source, make them ideal candidates for this application. Herein, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of QDAC-based DDSI in excised xenografts. PROCEDURES: Excised fresh specimens of normal tissue and human tumor xenografts with elevated expression of HER2 were stained with a HER2-targeted QDAC and an untargeted QDAC isotype. Stained specimens were imaged on a custom hyperspectral imaging system capable of spectrally separating the quantum dot signatures, and images processed using the DDSI approach. The diagnostic performance of this technique under different incubation temperatures and probe concentrations was evaluated using receiver-operator characteristic analysis.
resultsHER2-targeted QDAC-DDSI was able to distinguish HER2(+) tumors from normal tissue with reasonably high diagnostic performance; however, this performance was sensitive to temperature during the staining procedure. Area under the curve values were 0.61 when staining at room temperature but increased to over 0.81 when staining at 37 °C. Diagnostic performance was not affected by increasing stain concentration.
conclusionsThis study is the first to report dual-probe difference imaging of specimens using QDACs and hyperspectral imaging. Our results show promising diagnostic performance under certain conditions, and compel further optimization and evaluation of this intra-operative margin assessment technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.