Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32160256›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Takashi Shiga, Yoshiyuki Nakashima, Yasuhiro Norisue, Tetsunori Ikegami, Takahiro Uechi, Yuhei Otaki, Hidehiko Nakano, Keibun Ryu, Shinjiro Wakai, Hiraku Funakoshi and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takashi ShigaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Tokyo, Otawara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4616-1729
Yoshiyuki NakashimaNakashima Clinic, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiro NorisueDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu-Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu City, Chiba, Japan.
Tetsunori IkegamiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki City, Okayama, Japan.
Takahiro UechiDepartment of General Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka City, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuhei OtakiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidehiko NakanoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Keibun RyuDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Maebashi Red Cross Hospital, Maebashi City, Gunma, Japan.
Shinjiro WakaiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiraku FunakoshiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu-Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu City, Chiba, Japan.
Shigeki FujitaniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Mariana University, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yasuharu TokudaMuribushi Okinawa for Teaching Hospitals, Urasoe City, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-7934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professionalism is a critical competency for emergency medicine (EM) physicians, and professional behavior affects patient satisfaction. However, the findings of various studies indicate that there are differences in the interpretation of professionalism among EM resident physicians and faculty physicians. Using a cross-sectional survey, we aimed to analyze common challenges to medical professionalism for Japanese EM physicians and survey the extent of professionalism coursework completed during undergraduate medical education. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey of EM resident physicians and faculty physicians at academic conferences and eight teaching hospitals in Japan using the questionnaire by Barry and colleagues. We analyzed the frequency of providing either the best or second-best answers to each scenario as the main outcome measure and compared the frequencies between EM resident physicians and EM faculty physicians. Fisher's exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to analyze data. A total of 176 physicians (86 EM resident physicians and 90 EM faculty physicians) completed the survey. The response rate was 92.6%. The most challenging scenario presented to participants dealt with sexual harassment, and only 44.5% chose the best or second-best answers, followed by poor responses to the confidentiality scenario (69.9%). The frequency of either the best or second-best responses to the confidentiality scenario was significantly greater for EM resident physicians than for EM faculty physicians (77.1% versus 62.9%, p = 0.048). More participants in the EM resident physician group completed formal courses in medical professionalism than those in the EM faculty physician group (25.8% versus 5.5%, p < 0.01). Further, EM faculty physicians were less likely than EM resident physicians to provide acceptable responses in terms of confidentiality, and few of both had received professionalism training through school curricula. Continuous professionalism education focused on the prevention of sexual harassment and gender gap is needed for both EM resident physicians and faculty physicians in Japan.

Indexed as

AdultClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEmergency MedicineFaculty, MedicalFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansInternship and ResidencyJapanMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID32160256
PMCPMC7065769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.