ArticlePloS one2020
Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of the status of veterinary epidemiological research in two species regarding the FAIR guiding principles.BMC veterinary research · 2021Pooled it
- Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review.Wellcome open research · 2021Pooled it
- Data sharing statements: impact of journal policies across clinical research disciplines.European heart journal · 2026Article
- The Role of Data Papers in Scientific Data Dissemination and Reuse.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Community needs for FAIR pathogen data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Data sharing in acupuncture meta-analyses: Associations with journal policies and practical considerations.Integrative medicine research · 2026Article
- Assessing the adoption of the FAIR principles in Italian environmental research infrastructures.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- What helps and hinders reproducible research? Researchers' perspectives from a cross-disciplinary interview study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Beyond Boundaries: Data Sharing in Motor Development Research-Best Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities.Journal of motor learning and development · 2026Article
- Digital transformation in laboratory documentation: Insights from an eLabFTW case study and a survey-informed onboarding framework.PloS one · 2026Article
- Infectious, Allergic, and Immune-Mediated Disease Data Resources: a Landscape Overview and Subset Assessment.Journal of medical systems · 2025Review
- Experiences of Health Research Data Sharing Among Researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- LION Data: A roaring transformation in data visualisation.Computers & chemical engineering · 2025Article
- Understanding and processing informed consent during data-intensive health research in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and opportunities from a multilingual perspective.Research ethics · 2025Article
- Stepping up to the moment: collaborating on a data management and sharing workshop series.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2025Article
- Beliefs about social dynamics and open science.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Historical and ongoing inequities shape research visibility in Latin American aquatic mammal paleontology.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Reusability challenges of livestock production data to improve animal health.Scientific data · 2025Article
- International initiatives to enhance awareness and uptake of open research in psychology: a systematic mapping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- An approach to making life sciences FAIR-FAIR-DS as a tool for Aspergillus fumigatus.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith data becoming a centerpiece of modern scientific discovery, data sharing by scientists is now a crucial element of scientific progress. This article aims to provide an in-depth examination of the practices and perceptions of data management, including data storage, data sharing, and data use and reuse by scientists around the world.
methodsThe Usability and Assessment Working Group of DataONE, an NSF-funded environmental cyberinfrastructure project, distributed a survey to a multinational and multidisciplinary sample of scientific researchers in a two-waves approach in 2017-2018. We focused our analysis on examining the differences across age groups, sub-disciplines of science, and sectors of employment.
findingsMost respondents displayed what we describe as high and mediocre risk data practices by storing their data on their personal computer, departmental servers or USB drives. Respondents appeared to be satisfied with short-term storage solutions; however, only half of them are satisfied with available mechanisms for storing data beyond the life of the process. Data sharing and data reuse were viewed positively: over 85% of respondents admitted they would be willing to share their data with others and said they would use data collected by others if it could be easily accessed. A vast majority of respondents felt that the lack of access to data generated by other researchers or institutions was a major impediment to progress in science at large, yet only about a half thought that it restricted their own ability to answer scientific questions. Although attitudes towards data sharing and data use and reuse are mostly positive, practice does not always support data storage, sharing, and future reuse. Assistance through data managers or data librarians, readily available data repositories for both long-term and short-term storage, and educational programs for both awareness and to help engender good data practices are clearly needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.