ArticleJCO oncology practice2020
Understanding Molecular Testing Uptake Across Tumor Types in Eight Countries: Results From a Multinational Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in JCO oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing Precision Medicine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Diagnostics in a Southeast Asian Country.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence to unlock real-world evidence in clinical oncology: A primer on recent advances.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- Benefits from early trial involvement in metastatic colorectal cancer: outcomes from the phase I unit at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute UK.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Analyses of sex-based clinicopathological differences among patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms in Europe.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Distribution of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in Europe: results from a retrospective cross-sectional study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among 80,193 gastrointestinal cancer patients in five European and three Asian countries.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Prevalence of Lung Metastases among 19,321 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients in Eight Countries of Europe and Asia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Ethical considerations of genetic and genomic testing in pediatric oncology: A narrative review.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe growth in understanding of molecular biology and genomics has augmented the development of targeted cancer treatments; however, challenges exist in access to molecular testing, an essential precursor to treatment decision-making. We used data from a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the differences in uptake of molecular testing.
methodsUsing the aggregated results of a questionnaire developed and distributed to clinicians by IQVIA, including treatment details and investigations undertaken for patients, we compared proportions of patients receiving molecular testing and targeted treatment by cancer type for the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Japan, and China. We used multivariable logistic regression methods to understand the effect of country on the odds of receiving a molecular test.
resultsThere was a total of 61,491 cases. Across countries and cancer types, uptake rates for molecular testing ranged between 2% and 98%, with the greatest differences seen in gastric cancers (range, 23% to 70%), and significant variations were observed for both European and Asian countries. China consistently demonstrated a significantly reduced uptake for all molecular tests assessed; however; uptake of drug treatment in gastric cancers after testing positive for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene was higher than in some European countries (China, 85%; European range, 8% to 66%). The uptake of epidermal growth factor receptor gene testing was greater in some Asian countries relative to the United Kingdom, where incidence of lung cancer is higher (Japan: odds ratio, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.6 to 3.8]; South Korea: odds ratio, 2.7 [95% CI, 2 to 3.4]).
conclusionWe have highlighted inequity in access to molecular testing and subsequent treatments across countries, which warrants improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.