Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32160136›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2020

Understanding Molecular Testing Uptake Across Tumor Types in Eight Countries: Results From a Multinational Cross-Sectional Survey.

Pinkie Chambers, Kenneth K C Man, Vivian W Y Lui, Sheila Mpima, Paola Nasuti, Martin D Forster, Ian C K Wong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Pinkie ChambersResearch Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
Kenneth K C ManResearch Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
Vivian W Y LuiSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Sheila MpimaIQVIA Real-World & Analytics Solutions, London, United Kingdom.
Paola NasutiIQVIA Real-World & Analytics Solutions, London, United Kingdom.
Martin D ForsterDepartment of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute/UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ian C K WongResearch Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
IQVIA (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity College London · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · CNUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

HSRD VA CDA 10-016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe growth in understanding of molecular biology and genomics has augmented the development of targeted cancer treatments; however, challenges exist in access to molecular testing, an essential precursor to treatment decision-making. We used data from a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the differences in uptake of molecular testing.

methodsUsing the aggregated results of a questionnaire developed and distributed to clinicians by IQVIA, including treatment details and investigations undertaken for patients, we compared proportions of patients receiving molecular testing and targeted treatment by cancer type for the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Japan, and China. We used multivariable logistic regression methods to understand the effect of country on the odds of receiving a molecular test.

resultsThere was a total of 61,491 cases. Across countries and cancer types, uptake rates for molecular testing ranged between 2% and 98%, with the greatest differences seen in gastric cancers (range, 23% to 70%), and significant variations were observed for both European and Asian countries. China consistently demonstrated a significantly reduced uptake for all molecular tests assessed; however; uptake of drug treatment in gastric cancers after testing positive for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene was higher than in some European countries (China, 85%; European range, 8% to 66%). The uptake of epidermal growth factor receptor gene testing was greater in some Asian countries relative to the United Kingdom, where incidence of lung cancer is higher (Japan: odds ratio, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.6 to 3.8]; South Korea: odds ratio, 2.7 [95% CI, 2 to 3.4]).

conclusionWe have highlighted inequity in access to molecular testing and subsequent treatments across countries, which warrants improvements.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesAsiaChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFranceGermanyHumansItalyJapanRepublic of KoreaSpainUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID32160136
PMCPMC7427415
OpenAlexW3011988804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.