Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32159790›Full record

ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2020

Treatment guidelines in psoriatic arthritis.

Alexis Ogdie, Laura C Coates, Dafna D Gladman

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Psoriatic Arthritis: From Diagnosis to Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexis OgdieDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Laura C CoatesNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Dafna D GladmanUniversity of Toronto, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Department of Health CS-2016-16-016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex inflammatory musculoskeletal and skin disease. The treatment of PsA has changed substantially over the past 10 years. Clinical practice guidelines are developed to help busy clinicians rapidly integrate evolving knowledge of therapeutic management into practice. In this review, we compare PsA treatment recommendations or guidelines developed by one national organization [ACR and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) in 2018], one regional organization (EULAR in 2015), and one international organization (the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in 2015). We examine the development of guidelines in PsA more broadly and examine similarities and differences in the three sets of recommendations.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, PsoriaticBiological FactorsBiomarkersComorbidityDisease ManagementHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPractice Guidelines as TopicRheumatologyTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological FactorsBiomarkersoutcomespsoriatic arthritistherapytreatment guidelinestreat-to-target

Identifiers

PMID32159790
PMCPMC7065461
OpenAlexW3010766827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.