Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32159260›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

Safety of percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of adrenal lesions in dogs: Perception of the procedure by radiologists and presentation of 50 cases.

Pascaline Pey, Alessia Diana, Federica Rossi, Jeremy Mortier, Ulrike Kafka, Stefanie Veraa, Anna Groth, Megan MacLellan, Chiara Marin, Federico Fracassi

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Pascaline PeyDepartment of Veterinary Medical Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3917-4756
Alessia DianaDepartment of Veterinary Medical Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federica RossiClinica Veterinaria dell'Orologio, Bologna, Italy.
Jeremy MortierService of Diagnostic Imaging, Small Animal Teaching Hospital, Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom.
Ulrike KafkaJames Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Stefanie VeraaDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anna GrothNorth Downs Specialist Referrals, Bletchingley, United Kingdom.
Megan MacLellanBluePearl Pet Hospital, Blaine, Maine.
Chiara MarinDepartment of Veterinary Medical Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federico FracassiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3121-2199
University of Bologna · ITJames Cook University · AUNorth Downs Hospital · GBPacific Arts Association · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBUtrecht University · NLVeterinary Oncological Center · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of adrenal gland lesions is controversial in veterinary medicine.

objectiveTo evaluate the frequency and radiologists' perception of the risk of the procedure as well as determining the incidence of complications.

methodsRetrospective study. A first survey was submitted by e-mail to all board-certified radiologists of the American College of Veterinary Radiology (ACVR) and European College of Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging (ECVDI). A second survey was sent to radiologists who declared having performed the procedure at least once in their career (observational cross-sectional case study).

resultsThe first survey was sent to 977 diplomates and answered by 138. Of 138 diplomates, 40 currently performed the procedure and 98 did not; 44 of the 98 gave the hypertensive crisis risk in pheochromocytoma as a reason. To the second survey, 12 of 65 responded positively; 50 dogs with 58 lesions were recruited, including 23 pheochromocytomas. Complications were reported in 4 of 50 dogs; 3 hemorrhages (1 mild and 1 moderate) and 1 death from acute respiratory distress syndrome (possibly related to laryngeal paralysis). No hypertensive crisis was reported. There was no relationship between the method of FNA/type of needle used and occurrence of complications. Based on the recollection of these 65 radiologists, who performed approximately 200 FNA of adrenal lesions, a death rate of approximately 1% was estimated. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Percutaneous US-guided FNA of adrenal lesions can be considered a minimally risky procedure, despite the negative perception by radiologists.

Indexed as

RadiologistsAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsAnimalsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleDog DiseasesDogsFemaleMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyUltrasonography, Interventionalcaninecarcinomacytologypheochromocytoma

Identifiers

PMID32159260
PMCPMC7096638
OpenAlexW3012554583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.