Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32159215›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2020

TeaMiD: a comprehensive database of simple sequence repeat markers of tea.

Himanshu Dubey, Hukam C Rawal, Megha Rohilla, Urvashi Lama, P Mohan Kumar, Tanoy Bandyopadhyay, Madhurjya Gogoi, Nagendra Kumar Singh, Tapan Kumar Mondal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome Survey and SSR Analysis ofGenetics research · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-wide development and application of miRNA-SSR markers inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Himanshu DubeyIndian Council Agricultural Research-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Lal Bahadur Sashtri Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India.
Hukam C RawalIndian Council Agricultural Research-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Lal Bahadur Sashtri Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India.
Megha RohillaIndian Council Agricultural Research-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Lal Bahadur Sashtri Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India.
Urvashi LamaDarjeeling Tea Research and Development Centre, Tea Board, Ministry of Commerce, B.T.M. Sarani (Brabourne Road), Kolkata, West Bengal 700001, India.
P Mohan KumarDarjeeling Tea Research and Development Centre, Tea Board, Ministry of Commerce, B.T.M. Sarani (Brabourne Road), Kolkata, West Bengal 700001, India.
Tanoy BandyopadhyayDepartment of Biotechnology, Tocklai Experimental Station, Tea Research Association, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Madhurjya GogoiDepartment of Biotechnology, Tocklai Experimental Station, Tea Research Association, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Nagendra Kumar SinghIndian Council Agricultural Research-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Lal Bahadur Sashtri Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India.
Tapan Kumar MondalIndian Council Agricultural Research-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Lal Bahadur Sashtri Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INTea Research Association · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tea is a highly cross-pollinated, woody, perennial tree. High heterozygosity combined with a long gestational period makes conventional breeding a cumbersome process. Therefore, marker-assisted breeding is a better alternative approach when compared with conventional breeding. Considering the large genome size of tea (~3 Gb), information about simple sequence repeat (SSR) is scanty. Thus, we have taken advantage of the recently published tea genomes to identify large numbers of SSR markers in the tea. Besides the genomic sequences, we identified SSRs from the other publicly available sequences such as RNA-seq, GSS, ESTs and organelle genomes (chloroplasts and mitochondrial) and also searched published literature to catalog validated set of tea SSR markers. The complete exercise yielded a total of 935 547 SSRs. Out of the total, 82 SSRs were selected for validation among a diverse set of tea genotypes. Six primers (each with four to six alleles, an average of five alleles per locus) out of the total 27 polymorphic primers were used for a diversity analysis in 36 tea genotypes with mean polymorphic information content of 0.61-0.76. Finally, using all the information generated in this study, we have developed a user-friendly database (TeaMiD; http://indianteagenome.in:8080/teamid/) that hosts SSR from all the six resources including three nuclear genomes of tea and transcriptome sequences of 17 Camellia wild species. Database URL: http://indianteagenome.in:8080/teamid/.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAllelesCamellia sinensisData MiningGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotypeInternetMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, GeneticUser-Computer InterfaceGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID32159215
PMCPMC7065459
OpenAlexW3011372919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.