ArticleCJC open2020
The Role of Ambulatory Heart Failure Clinics to Avoid Heart Failure Admissions.
Article in CJC open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in relation to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor treatment: real-world data from the multicentre HClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Motivational Interviewing for Enhancing Self-care in Patients With Heart Failure: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Treatment outcomes and associated factors among chronic ambulatory heart failure patients at Jimma Medical Center, South West Ethiopia: prospective observational study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Observational
- Therapeutic inertia in the pharmacological management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Management of Frail and Older Homebound Patients With Heart Failure: A Contemporary Virtual Ambulatory Model.CJC open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a complex relationship between heart failure (HF) clinic services and health outcomes. We hypothesized that ambulatory clinic activity may be associated with both hospital admission and also with avoidance of admission.
methodsA retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted examining activity in an ambulatory HF Clinic. Consecutive clinic visits in 2013 were recorded (n = 1728) and periods of high-intensity utilization (HIU) were identified (n = 128). A HIU period was defined by ≥2 consecutive clinic visits within 30 days, ending after 30 days passed without an additional clinic visit. For each HIU period identified, patient characteristics (n = 107) and all clinic visits (n = 324) were examined. HIU periods were then classified by association with hospital admission (±30 days).
resultsIn 2013, 18.8% of all clinic visits occurred during HIU periods, involving 13.7% of the clinic population. Thirty-eight percent of HIU periods were associated with 62 total hospital admissions (±30 days), of which 58% (n = 36) were for a primary diagnosis of HF. In addition,17 HIU periods met criteria for admission avoided, and 7 HIU periods occurring after hospital discharge also met criteria for admission avoided.
conclusionsWe identified periods of intensive ambulatory clinic activity dedicated to patients with high burdens of comorbidities and both HF and non-HF-related admissions. These periods were also associated with episodes of successful decongestion with oral diuretics, resulting in avoidance of admission. Identifying HF patients who can be treated successfully or who are likely to require admission may be helpful for allocating clinic resources.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.