ArticleCJC open2019
Targeted Temperature Management After Cardiac Arrest: The Montreal Heart Institute Experience.
Article in CJC open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTargeted temperature management (TTM) has been associated with an improvement in neurological function and survival in patients with cardiac arrest (CA) and an initially shockable rhythm. We report the Montreal Heart Institute (MHI) experience using TTM to evaluate mortality and neurological outcome in patients remaining in coma after CA, regardless of the initial rhythm.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of all patients receiving TTM at the MHI between 2008 and 2015. Primary outcome was a composite of mortality and poor neurological outcome at hospital discharge. We also evaluated the long-term outcomes of those who initially survived to hospital discharge.
resultsA total of 147 patients (120 men, mean age 59.5 ± 12.5 years) underwent TTM at the MHI during the study period. Overall survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome was 45.6%. Shockable rhythm was associated with a better outcome (mortality odds ratio, 0.212; 95% confidence interval, 0.068-0.664;
conclusionOur retrospective analysis of CA survivors treated with TTM at MHI showed good survival, similar to the published results from the landmark randomized controlled trials, despite enrolling patients with nonshockable rhythms. A significant proportion of survivors with poor neurological outcome at discharge improved at follow-up.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.