Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32159009›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2018

Identifying Environmental Risk Factors and Mapping the Distribution of West Nile Virus in an Endemic Region of North America.

A Hess, J K Davis, M C Wimberly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A meteorological-based forecasting model for predicting minimal infection rates inCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A HessDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability University of Oklahoma Norman OK USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5598-2556
J K DavisDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability University of Oklahoma Norman OK USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-8811
M C WimberlyDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability University of Oklahoma Norman OK USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1549-3891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the geographic distribution of mosquito-borne disease and mapping disease risk are important for prevention and control efforts. Mosquito-borne viruses (arboviruses), such as West Nile virus (WNV), are highly dependent on environmental conditions. Therefore, the use of environmental data can help in making spatial predictions of disease distribution. We used geocoded human case data for 2004-2017 and population-weighted control points in combination with multiple geospatial environmental data sets to assess the environmental drivers of WNV cases and to map relative infection risk in South Dakota, USA. We compared the effectiveness of (1) land cover and physiography data, (2) climate data, and (3) spectral data for mapping the risk of WNV in South Dakota. A final model combining all data sets was used to predict spatial patterns of disease transmission and characterize the associations between environmental factors and WNV risk. We used a boosted regression tree model to identify the most important variables driving WNV risk and generated risk maps by applying this model across the entire state. We found that combining multiple sources of environmental data resulted in the most accurate predictions. Elevation, late-season humidity, and early-season surface moisture were the most important predictors of disease distribution. Indices that quantified interannual variability of climatic conditions and land surface moisture were better predictors than interannual means. We suggest that combining measures of interannual environmental variability with static land cover and physiography variables can help to improve spatial predictions of arbovirus transmission risk.

Indexed as

climatedisease mapland covermosquito‐borne diseaseremote sensingspatial model

Identifiers

PMID32159009
PMCPMC7007078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.