Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158888›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2019

Breast augmentation in male-to-female transgender patients: Technical considerations and outcomes.

Travis J Miller, Stelios C Wilson, Jonathan P Massie, Shane D Morrison, Thomas Satterwhite

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Why the "Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Travis J MillerDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Stelios C WilsonHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Jonathan P MassieDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Shane D MorrisonDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Thomas SatterwhiteBrownstein and Crane Surgical Services, San Francisco, CA, United States.
New York University · USNorthwestern University · USStanford University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGender-affirmation surgery is essential in the management of gender dysphoria. For male-to-female transgender women (transwomen), feminization of the chest is a component in this process. There is minimal literature describing effective and safe techniques for breast augmentation in transwomen. Here we describe our operative techniques and considerations.

methodsA retrospective review of a single surgeon experience was performed for transwomen who underwent primary breast augmentation between October 1, 2014, and February 1, 2017. Surgical outcomes and complications were analyzed.

resultsThirty-four patients with an average age of 34.4 years were included in this series (range 19-59 years). Surgical approach was through an inframammary incision with a submuscular pocket and either silicone smooth round (24%) or textured anatomic implants (76%). Six patients experienced postoperative complications (17.6%). Two patients underwent reoperation for implant extrusion (5.9%). Higher BMI and longer preoperative hormonal therapy duration were significantly associated with complications (

conclusionsBreast augmentation in transwomen is safe and typically leads to high patient satisfaction with improvement of gender dysphoria. Larger, longer term studies are needed to appropriately delineate complication risks and contributing factors.

Indexed as

Breast augmentationOutcomesPatient reported outcomesTransgender

Identifiers

PMID32158888
PMCPMC7061686
OpenAlexW2938057460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.