ReviewJPRAS open2018
Tissue expansion reconstruction of head and neck burn injuries in paediatric patients - A systematic review.
Review in JPRAS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- 4D-printed adaptive hydrogel tissue expanders for ear and breast reconstruction.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Hippo Pathway Regulates Cell Proliferation in Skin Epidermis Exposed to Mechanical Forces.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- The efficacy of skin soft tissue expansion and recombinant human epidermal growth factor in the repair of second-degree scald scars: a prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- A machine learning approach to predict in vivo skin growth.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A machine learning approach to predictResearch square · 2024Article
- Tissue expansion techniques in reconstructive surgery: a 10-year bibliometric analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue expansion reconstruction in clinical practice has existed for over half a century. The technique was initially used for breast reconstruction but later found its use in reconstruction of excisional defects resulting from a variety of causes including surgery for post-burn/post-traumatic deformities, congenital giant naevi, skin cancer, etc. It offers an improved matching of skin colour and texture, and avoids the high infrastructure requirements of microsurgery for free flap transfers. We present a systematic literature review of 35 worldwide English language articles with representative cases of paediatric tissue expansion reconstruction of burn injuries of the head and neck. The review identified 68 children of an average age of 11.3 years. The most common burn aetiology was flame burn injury. The average area to be reconstructed was of 206 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.