Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158828›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2018

Therapeutic strategies for elbow ankylosis due to heterotopic ossification in patients with severe burns.

Motomu Suito, Shunsuke Yuzuriha, Motonao Iwasawa, Daisuke Yanagisawa, Yuto Kinjo, Ikkei Takashimizu, Yuki Hoshino

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05547867 (Elbow Heterotopic Ossifications Associated With Radial Head Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05547867 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Elbow Heterotopic Ossifications Associated With Radial Head Prosthesis: Risk and Prognostic Factors

TypeobservationalSponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauRan2022 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsRadial Head FractureArmsRadial head prosthesis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Motomu SuitoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Shunsuke YuzurihaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Motonao IwasawaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nagano Red Cross Hospital, Wakasato, Nagano, Nagano, Japan.
Daisuke YanagisawaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Yuto KinjoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Ikkei TakashimizuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Yuki HoshinoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Shinshu University · JPNagano Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeterotopic ossification (HO) occurs frequently in the elbow in burn patients, and extends beyond the anatomical structure. HO of the elbow can cause joint contracture and adversely affect activities of daily living.Currently, there is no effective prophylaxis for HO as the precise underlying mechanism remains unknown. Therefore, there is no choice but to treat HO after it has developed. To date, however, no effective standard treatment has been reported, and therefore treatment methods vary between different facilities. Surgical resection is widely accepted as the only therapeutic option once HO limits functional mobility of the elbow. PURPOSES: Based on past reports, we examined our cases and recommend effective therapeutic strategies. We posed the following three questions: (1) Is the surgical intervention effective or detrimental for elbow ankylosis due to HO? (2) What is the best timing for the intervention? (3) What is the most effective postoperative rehabilitation plan?

methodsWe treated three patients with complete ankylosis of the elbow due to HO after severe burn injury using different protocols.

resultsSurgery was performed in two cases and rehabilitation therapy was commenced immediately from the first postoperative day. Both patients showed improvement in the active range of motion in their elbow joints. The other patient did not undergo surgery, and his elbows became fixed in the completely extension position.

conclusionSurgical resection is beneficial for elbow ankylosis due to HO after burn injury. Although the exact surgical timing is still controversial, we recommend that surgery should be performed as soon as possible after improving the skin condition around the elbow and confirming the maturation of HO on radiographs. Early rehabilitation and pain control are also important after surgery.

Indexed as

BurnEctopic boneElbowHeterotopic ossificationRehabilitationSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID32158828
PMCPMC7061606
OpenAlexW2844808744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.