Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158811›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2018

Does nipple-areolar tattooing matter in breast reconstruction? A cohort study using the BREAST-Q.

Andrea Smallman, Tamara Crittenden, Jia MiinYip, Nicola R Dean

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07008339 (Impact of Nipple Reconstruction in Mastectomized Patients Using Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Injection.), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07008339 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Nipple Reconstruction in Mastectomized Patients Using Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Injection.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGermans Trias i Pujol HospitalRan2023 to 2029Enrolled138ConditionsBreast Neoplasms, Mastectomy, Mammaplasty, Nipple DisorderArmsAreola Micropigmentation, Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Medical tattooing as a complementary cosmetic intervention to reduce body-image distress and mental health symptoms in U.S. breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Tattooing to reconstruct Nipple-Areola Complex after oncological breast surgery: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea SmallmanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Level 5, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5045, Australia.
Tamara CrittendenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Level 5, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5045, Australia.
Jia MiinYipDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Level 5, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5045, Australia.
Nicola R DeanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Level 5, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5045, Australia.
Flinders Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast reconstruction is achieved through a series of surgical procedures often concluded with nipple-areolar reconstruction tattoo. The purpose of the tattoo is to increase the patients' satisfaction with the appearance of the breast, however, no published studies quantitatively compare patient satisfaction before vs. after tattoo. In recent times nurse practitioners are increasingly performing this specialised procedure previously undertaken by the plastic surgeon, but there is no evidence to compare patient satisfaction according to clinician. PURPOSE: The objectives of this study are to examine patient satisfaction pre- and post-nipple-areolar tattooing utilising a validated patient-reported outcome measure the BREAST-Q, and to identify any differences in patient satisfaction between the nurse practitioner and plastic surgeon.

methodsData was collected from all breast reconstruction patients who underwent nipple-areolar reconstruction tattooing over a six-year period in a dedicated Breast Reconstruction Unit and had completed a pre- and post-tattoo BREAST- Q questionnaire. Analysis of data included paired t-test of pre- and post-tattoo scores and ANCOVA to compare clinicians and tattoo laterality.

results93 patients with completed pre- and post-tattoo questionnaires within the date criteria were included from the 204 patientswho had a nipple-areolar tattoo. There was a significant improvement in patient satisfaction with nipple reconstruction from pre-tattoo (m = 74.4) to post-tattoo (m = 81.0), p = 0.013 (2-tailed), with no significant difference between clinicians.

conclusionPatients reported through completion of the BREAST-Q, that nipple-areolar tattooing significantly improves satisfaction with their nipple reconstruction.

Indexed as

BREAST-QBreast reconstructionNipple-areolar reconstruction tattooingPatient-reported outcomes measure

Identifiers

PMID32158811
PMCPMC7061635
OpenAlexW2793301373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.