ArticleJPRAS open2018
Treatment of a chronically infected nasal silicone prosthesis with continuous antibiotic irrigation and gentamicin-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads.
Article in JPRAS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioengineered nasal septum implant with 3D-printed silicone and chondrocyte-seeded fibrin hydrogel.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Tigecycline Containing Polymethylmethacrylate Cement Against MRSA, VRE, and ESBL-In Vitro Mechanical and Microbiological Investigations.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of mechanical engineering innovations in biomedical advancements.In vitro models · 2024Review
- Immediate Nasal Reconstruction in Management of Infected Nasal Alloplast and Allografts: A Case Series.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- In Vitro Tests of FDM 3D-Printed Diclofenac Sodium-Containing Implants.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infected nasal alloplasts in revision rhinoplasty can be a complex problem, as timing between implant removal and reconstruction is the major limiting factor. Delaying reconstruction can result in loss of mechanical support, a constricted nose, and in severe cases, complete nasal airway collapse and respiratory compromise. In this case report, we describe a novel surgical approach for the management of a chronically infected nasal implant combining techniques used to treat biomaterial-associated infections: antibiotic-impregnated polymethymethacrylate beads and a continuous catheter-based antibiotic irrigation system. We report a case of a chronic alloplastic-associated infection following nasal reconstruction using a silicone implant. We utilized a two-staged approach. The involved nasal implant was removed and replaced temporarily with gentamicin-impregnated polymethymethacrylate beads and a continuous closed irrigation and drainage system with local and parenteral delivery of antibiotics. Both modalities allowed for complete eradication of the infection. In addition, the gentamicin beads provided sufficient mechanical support in order to minimize the risk of skin contracture. Twelve days after her initial surgery, nasal reconstruction was performed using a cadaver bone graft. The patient was followed for two years postoperatively and has shown good results with no evidence of skin contracture or recurrent infection. This technique may allow for shorter delay in revision surgery and reduce the risk of long-term complications without compromising functional and aesthetic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.