ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2020
Chromatin Compaction Multiscale Modeling: A Complex Synergy Between Theory, Simulation, and Experiment.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct visualization and tracing of chromatin folding in the Drosophila embryo.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Structure of native chromatin fibres revealed by Cryo-ET in situ.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Combining molecular dynamics simulations and scoring method to computationally model ubiquitylated linker histones in chromatosomes.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Brownian dynamics simulations of mesoscale chromatin fibers.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Cohesin and CTCF complexes mediate contacts in chromatin loops depending on nucleosome positions.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- The Effects of Histone H2B Ubiquitylations on the Nucleosome Structure and Internucleosomal Interactions.Biochemistry · 2022Article
- Chromatin as self-returning walks: From population to single cell and back.Biophysical reports · 2022Review
- Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2021Review
- Multiscale modeling of genome organization with maximum entropy optimization.The Journal of chemical physics · 2021Article
- Biomolecular modeling thrives in the age of technology.Nature computational science · 2021Article
- Nano-Surveillance: Tracking Individual Molecules in a Sea of Chromatin.Journal of molecular biology · 2021Review
- Contribution of advanced fluorescence nano microscopy towards revealing mitotic chromosome structure.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021Review
- 3D reconstruction of genomic regions from sparse interaction data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Review
- Cryo-nanoscale chromosome imaging-future prospects.Biophysical reviews · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms that trigger chromatin compaction, its patterns, and the factors they depend on, is a fundamental and still open question in Biology. Chromatin compacts and reinforces DNA and is a stable but dynamic structure, to make DNA accessible to proteins. In recent years, computational advances have provided larger amounts of data and have made large-scale simulations more viable. Experimental techniques for the extraction and reconstitution of chromatin fibers have improved, reinvigorating theoretical and experimental interest in the topic and stimulating debate on points previously considered as certainties regarding chromatin. A great assortment of approaches has emerged, from all-atom single-nucleosome or oligonucleosome simulations to various degrees of coarse graining, to polymer models, to fractal-like structures and purely topological models. Different fiber-start patterns have been studied in theory and experiment, as well as different linker DNA lengths. DNA is a highly charged macromolecule, making ionic and electrostatic interactions extremely important for chromatin topology and dynamics. Indeed, the repercussions of varying ionic concentration have been extensively examined at the computational level, using all-atom, coarse-grained, and continuum techniques. The presence of high-curvature AT-rich segments in DNA can cause conformational variations, attesting to the fact that the role of DNA is both structural and electrostatic. There have been some tentative attempts to describe the force fields governing chromatin conformational changes and the energy landscapes of these transitions, but the intricacy of the system has hampered reaching a consensus. The study of chromatin conformations is an intrinsically multiscale topic, influenced by a wide range of biological and physical interactions, spanning from the atomic to the chromosome level. Therefore, powerful modeling techniques and carefully planned experiments are required for an overview of the most relevant phenomena and interactions. The topic provides fertile ground for interdisciplinary studies featuring a synergy between theoretical and experimental scientists from different fields and the cross-validation of respective results, with a multi-scale perspective. Here, we summarize some of the most representative approaches, and focus on the importance of electrostatics and solvation, often overlooked aspects of chromatin modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.