Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158723›Full record

ReviewHip & pelvis2020

Three-dimensional-printing Technology in Hip and Pelvic Surgery: Current Landscape.

Seong-Hwan Woo, Myung-Jin Sung, Kyung-Soon Park, Taek-Rim Yoon

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hip & pelvis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. [Tumour arthroplasty].Der Orthopade · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seong-Hwan WooDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
Myung-Jin SungDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
Kyung-Soon ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
Taek-Rim YoonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8282-1723
Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of three-dimensional (3D) printing is becoming more common, including in the field of orthopaedic surgery. There are currently four primary clinical applications for 3D-printing in hip and pelvic surgeries: (i) 3D-printed anatomical models for planning and surgery simulation, (ii) patient-specific instruments (PSI), (iii) generation of prostheses with 3D-additive manufacturing, and (iv) custom 3D-printed prostheses. Simulation surgery using a 3D-printed bone model allows surgeons to develop better surgical approaches, test the feasibility of procedures and determine optimal location and size for a prosthesis. PSI will help inform accurate bone cuts and prosthesis placement during surgery. Using 3D-additive manufacturing, especially with a trabecular pattern, is possible to produce a prosthesis mechanically stable and biocompatible prosthesis capable of promoting osseointergration. Custom implants are useful in patients with massive acetabular bone loss or periacetabular malignant bone tumors as they may improve the fit between implants and patient-specific anatomy. 3D-printing technology can improve surgical efficiency, shorten operation times and reduce exposure to radiation. This technology also offers new potential for treating complex hip joint diseases. Orthopaedic surgeons should develop guidelines to outline the most effective uses of 3D-printing technology to maximize patient benefits.

Indexed as

HipPelvisPrintingProstheses and implantsThree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID32158723
PMCPMC7054078
OpenAlexW3009794687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.