Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158645›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Vaccine Protection Against Experimental Challenge Infection with a PPV-27a Genotype Virus in Pregnant Gilts.

István Kiss, Edit Kovács, Zoltán Zádori, István Mészáros, Attila Cságola, Pál Bajnóczi, Preben Mortensen, Vilmos Palya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

István KissCeva-Phylaxia Co. Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7839-4415
Edit KovácsCeva-Phylaxia Co. Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán ZádoriInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
István MészárosInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila CságolaCeva-Phylaxia Co. Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
Pál BajnócziProphyl Ltd., Mohács, Hungary.
Preben MortensenCeva Animal Health, Libourne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-8720
Vilmos PalyaCeva-Phylaxia Co. Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3319-9995
Teva Pharmaceuticals (Hungary) · HUHUN-REN Veterinary Medical Research Institute · HUDépartement Santé Animale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

introductionPorcine parvovirus (PPV), the causative agent of severe reproductive failures in pigs, is present worldwide. The witnessed spread of the virulent 27a type PPV strains since its recognition raised concerns about the efficacy of the available commercial vaccines.

methodsTo address this question, vaccinated pregnant gilts were challenged with a PPV-27a-like virus strain and parameters related to vaccine efficacy were compared.

resultsThe K22 vaccine strain of Parvoruvax

conclusionStronger protection was provided by the "Kresse-like" K22 PPV strain-based vaccine than by the NADL-2 and NADL-like strain-based commercial vaccines against a PPV-27a cluster strain challenge. Vaccine-induced antibody levels as measured pre-challenge were not found to be an accurate indicator of protection.

Indexed as

efficacyK22 strainPPVPPV-27a

Identifiers

PMID32158645
PMCPMC7048948
OpenAlexW3008278134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.