Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158630›Full record

ArticleMass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan)2020

Kendrick Analysis and Complex Isotopic Patterns: A Case Study of the Compositional Analysis of Pristine and Heated Polybrominated Flame Retardants by High-Resolution MALDI Mass Spectrometry.

Sayaka Nakamura, Hiroaki Sato, Thierry N J Fouquet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sayaka NakamuraPolymer Chemistry Group, Research Institute for Sustainable Chemistry, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiroaki SatoPolymer Chemistry Group, Research Institute for Sustainable Chemistry, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.
Thierry N J FouquetPolymer Chemistry Group, Research Institute for Sustainable Chemistry, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Kendrick analysis is used for the processing and visualization of mass spectra obtained from polymers containing C, H, O and/or Si with simple isotopic patterns (monoisotope=lightest isotope=most intense isotope for short chains). In the case of heteroatoms with complex isotopic patterns, the impact of the chosen isotope on point alignments in Kendrick plots has not been examined extensively. Rich isotopic patterns also make the evaluation of the mass and nature of the repeating unit and end-groups more difficult from the mass spectrum in the case of unknown samples due to the number of peaks and the absence of a monoisotopic peak. Using a polybrominated polycarbonate as running example, we report that horizontal point alignments can be obtained in a Kendrick plot using the mass of the most abundant isotope instead of the monoisotopic mass as is usually done. Rotating the plot ("reverse Kendrick analysis") helps to accurately evaluate the mass of the most abundant isotope of the repeating unit, as well as the nature of the brominated neutral expelled upon gentle heating (debromination or dehydrobromination). The whole procedure is then applied to the characterization of an unknown polybrominated flame retardant in an industrial formulation before and after heating.

Indexed as

data processingflame retardantisotopeKendrick analysispolymer

Identifiers

PMID32158630
PMCPMC7039712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.