Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158610›Full record

ReviewAnimal cells and systems2020

How to interpret and integrate multi-omics data at systems level.

Gun Tae Jung, Kwang-Pyo Kim, Kwoneel Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal cells and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systematic data analysis pipeline for quantitative morphological cell phenotyping.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gun Tae JungDepartment of Biomedical Science and Technology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kwang-Pyo KimDepartment of Biomedical Science and Technology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0544-2978
Kwoneel KimDepartment of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current parallel sequencing technologies generate biological sequence data explosively and enable omics studies that analyze collective biological features. The more omics data that is accumulated, the more they show the regulatory complexity of biological phenotypes. This high order regulatory complexity needs systems-level approaches, including network analysis, to understand it. There are a series of layers in the omics field that are closely connected to each other as described in 'central dogma.' We, therefore, have to not only interpret each single omics layer but also to integrate multi-omics layers systematically to get a full picture of the regulatory landscape of the biological phenotype. Especially, individual omics data has their own adequate biological network to apply systematic analysis appropriately. A full regulatory landscape can only be obtained when multi-omics data are incorporated within adequate networks. In this review, we discuss how to interpret and integrate multi-omics data systematically using recent studies. We also propose an analysis framework for systematic multi-omics interpretation by centering on the transcriptional core regulator, which can be incorporated in all omics networks.

Indexed as

co-expression networkMulti-omicsprotein interactome networktranscriptional core regulatortranscriptional regulatory network

Identifiers

PMID32158610
PMCPMC7048189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.