Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158490›Full record

ReviewDrugs in context2020

Management of type 2 diabetes: consensus of diabetes organizations.

Elaena Quattrocchi, Tamara Goldberg, Nino Marzella

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs in context, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative effectiveness of semaglutideFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Understanding the Burden of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Time for Action.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diabetes Mellitus and Its Implications in Aortic Stenosis Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elaena QuattrocchiArnold and Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Long Island University, Pharmacy.
Tamara GoldbergArnold and Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Long Island University, Pharmacy.
Nino MarzellaArnold and Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Long Island University, Pharmacy.
Long Island University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the advances in diabetes management, people with diabetes are not reaching their target glycemic goals. Healthcare professionals often fail to initiate, escalate, or de-intensify therapy when indicated. There are several organizations that provide guidance on the management of diabetes to assist the practitioner in achieving improved glycemic control, and this can cause confusion to the practitioner on which organizations' guidance to follow. Diabetes mellitus is associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease, and there have been studies that suggest some antidiabetic medications increase cardiovascular risk and some reduce cardiovascular risk. Diabetes organizations recommend the individualization of treatment goals and choices of drug therapy that will be safe and effective. Healthcare professionals should be knowledgeable and equipped to decide on the best treatment regimen for each of their patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and be familiar with how to utilize the different organizations' philosophies in treating their patients.

Indexed as

cardiovascular outcomesconsensusdiagnostic criteriamanagement of type 2 diabetesrenal outcomestreatment goalstype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32158490
PMCPMC7048113
OpenAlexW3003467607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.