Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158368›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of ageing2020

A critical review and development of a conceptual model of exclusion from social relations for older people.

Vanessa Burholt, Bethan Winter, Marja Aartsen, Costas Constantinou, Lena Dahlberg, Villar Feliciano, Jenny De Jong Gierveld, Sofie Van Regenmortel, Charles Waldegrave, Working Group on Exclusion from Social Relations, part of the COST-financed Research Network ‘Reducing Old-Age Exclusion: Collaborations in Research and Policy’ (ROSENet)

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of ageing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Understanding and Addressing Older Adults' Loneliness: The Social Relationship Expectations Framework.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Isolation or Replenishment? The Case of Partner Network Exclusivity and Partner Loss in Later Life.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. The role of the Internet in later life autonomy: Silver surfers in Spain.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vanessa Burholt1Centre for Innovative Ageing, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6789-127X
Bethan Winter1Centre for Innovative Ageing, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales UK.
Marja Aartsen2Centre for Welfare and Labour Research, OsloMet Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4246-7621
Costas Constantinou3University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Lena Dahlberg4School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7685-3216
Villar Feliciano6Department of Development and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jenny De Jong Gierveld7Faculty of Social Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5203-5059
Sofie Van Regenmortel9Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3853-7597
Charles WaldegraveFamily Centre Social Policy Research Unit, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9772-0677
Working Group on Exclusion from Social Relations, part of the COST-financed Research Network ‘Reducing Old-Age Exclusion: Collaborations in Research and Policy’ (ROSENet)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social exclusion is complex and dynamic, and it leads to the non-realization of social, economic, political or cultural rights or participation within a society. This critical review takes stock of the literature on exclusion of social relations. Social relations are defined as comprising social resources, social connections and social networks. An evidence review group undertook a critical review which integrates, interprets and synthesizes information across studies to develop a conceptual model of exclusion from social relations. The resulting model is a subjective interpretation of the literature and is intended to be the starting point for further evaluations. The conceptual model identifies individual risks for exclusion from social relations (personal attributes, biological and neurological risk, retirement, socio-economic status, exclusion from material resources and migration). It incorporates the evaluation of social relations, and the influence of psychosocial resources and socio-emotional processes, sociocultural, social-structural, environmental and policy contextual influences on exclusion from social relations. It includes distal outcomes of exclusion from social relations, that is, individual well-being, health and functioning, social opportunities and social cohesion. The dynamic relationships between elements of the model are also reported. We conclude that the model provides a subjective interpretation of the data and an excellent starting point for further phases of conceptual development and systematic evaluation(s). Future research needs to consider the use of sophisticated analytical tools and an interdisciplinary approach in order to understand the underlying biological and ecopsychosocial associations that contribute to individual and dynamic differences in the experience of exclusion from social relations.

Indexed as

DisadvantageKnowledge synthesisLater lifeOld-age exclusionSocial relations

Identifiers

PMID32158368
PMCPMC7040153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.