ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2020
The Relationship of SUV Value in PET-CT with Tumor Differentiation and Tumor Markers in Gastric Cancer.
Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Head-to-head study of [BMC cancer · 2024Trial
- Case Report: Multimodality imaging features and serial metabolic changes onFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Functional Parameters Derived from Diffusion-Weighted MRI and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2025Review
- Efficacy ofCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Preoperative prediction of the pathological stage of advanced gastric cancer byScientific reports · 2022Article
- Dual time point [18F]Flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) with water gastric distension in differentiation between malignant and benign gastric lesions.European journal of radiology open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to investigate the relationship between the use of fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), maximized standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values of tumors, and tumor differentiation and tumor markers during the initial staging of patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study included 50 patients (14 women and 36 men; mean age: 63±11 years; age range: 31-80 years) who had undergone initial staging with FDG-PET/CT after the diagnosis of gastric cancer with endoscopic biopsy between January and June 2013. Serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carcinogenic antigen 19-9 (CA 19.9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured in patients prior to imaging. PET/CT images were evaluated for primary tumors, locoregional spread, and distant organ metastases, and classified by tumor-node-metastasis staging. Semiquantitative data were collected by SUVmax measurements in pathological regions of involvement. Data were analyzed statistically.
resultsFDG-PET/CT showed primary gastric cancer with a sensitivity of 87%. Imaging findings were normal in 3 patients (1/3; mucinous adenocarcinoma, 2/3; signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma). With FDG-PET/CT, 3/50 patients were classified into Stage 1B, 3/50 patients into Stage 2, 5/50 patients into Stage 3A, 5/50 patients into Stage 3B, 5/50 patients into 3C and 29/50 patients into Stage 4. The mean SUVmax was calculated as 11.35±4.3 (poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma: 5.4±1.7; moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma: 10.3±4.8) for the primary tumor and 14.9±6.3 for tumor metastasis. A positive correlation was evident between the measured SUVmax and stage and the grade of primary tumor (p<0.05). While the relationship between SUVmax and levels of serum AFP and CRP was statistically significant (p<0.05), the relationship between SUVmax and levels of serum CA 19-9 and CEA was not statistically significant (p>0.05).
conclusionThe SUVmax of primary tumors was associated with the degree of differentiation of primary tumors and the biochemical tumor markers CRP and AFP. The fact that SUVmax of primary tumors is high supplies clues about the presence of the factors affecting prognosis of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.