Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158297›Full record

ArticleLung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Incidence of

Anurag Mehta, Mumtaz Saifi, Ullas Batra, M Suryavanshi, Kush Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Uniqueness of lung cancer in Southeast Asia.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Clinical outcomes ofEcancermedicalscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Clinical pathology (Thousand Oaks, Ventura County, Calif.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anurag MehtaLaboratory Services, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6517-3664
Mumtaz SaifiDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Ullas BatraMedical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3306-9824
M SuryavanshiDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Kush GuptaCatalyst Clinical Services, New Delhi, India.
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe

methodsPatients with stage IV NSCLC adenocarcinoma histology were considered for this study. The study was conducted according to the ethical principles stated in the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki and the applicable guidelines for good clinical practice. Clinical characteristics and treatment details were collected from patients' medical records.

resultsA total of 709 stage IV NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients were included in the study. There were 457 (64.46%) men and 252 (35.54%) women, with a median age of 60 years.

conclusion

Indexed as

crizotinibNSCLCROS1

Identifiers

PMID32158297
PMCPMC7047993
OpenAlexW3007157840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.