ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2020
Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward Genetic Testing of Rivaroxaban? Insights from a Systematic Review on the Role of Genetic Polymorphism in Rivaroxaban Therapy.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Pooled it
- Genetic variants ofJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Effect of Gene Polymorphism on the Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Outcomes of Rivaroxaban: State-of-the-Art Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Personalizing Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for a Diverse Population: Role of Race, Kidney Function, Drug Interactions, and Pharmacogenetics.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023Review
- Platelet function testing in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Observational
- Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study is to assess the influence of gene
methodsIn the multicenter prospective registry study of the efficacy and safety of a combined antithrombotic therapy 103 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation both undergoing or not a percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled. The trial assessed the primary outcomes (major bleeding, in-hospital death, cardiovascular death, stroke\transient ischaemic attack, death/renal insufficiency) and secondary outcomes (platelet reactivity units (PRU), rivaroxaban concentration).
resultsFor none of the clinical outcomes when combined with other covariates, the carriership of polymorphisms
conclusionIn situations of double or triple antithrombotic rivaroxaban and clopidogrel therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome, the genetic factors associated with bleeding complications risk (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.