Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158198›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2020

Contribution of Trough Concentration Data in the Evaluation of Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics for Drugs with Delayed Distributional Equilibrium and Long Half-Life.

Suein Choi, Sangil Jeon, Dong-Seok Yim, Seunghoon Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An experience on the model-based evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction for a long half-life drug.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suein ChoiPharmacometrics Institute for Practical Education and Training (PIPET), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5438-7819
Sangil JeonQ-Fitter, Seoul, Korea.
Dong-Seok YimPharmacometrics Institute for Practical Education and Training (PIPET), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2754-7500
Seunghoon HanPharmacometrics Institute for Practical Education and Training (PIPET), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9976-5120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe performance of "trough sampling before reaching steady-state" and "serial sampling beyond the interval between steady-state" in a multiple-dose pharmacokinetic evaluation was compared. Drugs with long half-lives, following multi-compartment pharmacokinetics, and whose distribution-related characteristics are less likely to be assessed within one dosing interval are focused. PATIENTS AND

methodsAmlodipine pharmacokinetic data were collected from a human pharmacology study performed in Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (Seoul, Korea). Plasma concentration data until 144 hrs after a single administration was used. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was conducted to obtain the "true" model structure and pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. Then, stochastic simulation and estimation were performed using multiple-dose scenarios in various sampling strategies. Parameter accuracy and precision from each scenario were evaluated.

resultsA two-compartment model with first-order absorption followed by zero-order absorption with a lag time then first-order elimination was chosen as the final model and used in the stochastic simulation and estimation. In terms of parameter precision, the scenario incorporating data only within one dosing interval showed the worst results (

conclusionIn multiple-dose studies on drugs with delayed distributional equilibrium, information from a few trough samples can augment the limit of serial sampling within the dosing interval for parameter estimation. With informative trough samples, extended hospitalization for serial sampling (until 3-5 half-lives after the last dose), which is particularly problematic for long half-life drugs, may be avoided. Trough samples obtained at the beginning of the repeated dose were more effective for mixed-effects modeling.

Indexed as

AmlodipineDelayed-Action PreparationsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHalf-LifeHumansNonlinear DynamicsRepublic of KoreaSeoulStochastic ProcessesAmlodipineDelayed-Action Preparationsmultiple-doseNONMEMpharmacokineticsstochastic simulation and estimationtrough sampling

Identifiers

PMID32158198
PMCPMC7049277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.