Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158098›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2020

Incidence and Analysis of 7 Years Adverse Transfusion Reaction: A Retrospective Analysis.

Suryatapa Saha, Deepthi Krishna, Raghuram Prasath, Deepti Sachan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tachycardia and fever after packed red cell (PRC) infusion: A case report.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Suryatapa Saha1Present Address: Department of Transfusion Medicine, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Calcutta, India.
Deepthi Krishna2Department of Transfusion Medicine, Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai, 600100 India.
Raghuram Prasath2Department of Transfusion Medicine, Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai, 600100 India.
Deepti Sachan2Department of Transfusion Medicine, Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai, 600100 India.ORCID 0000-0003-4572-5884
Gleneagles Hospital · SGApollo Gleneagles Hospitals · INTamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe blood transfusion is the primary need of all the health care delivery system. Though with the advances of transfusion medicine, the incidences of transfusion risk is gradually reduced, but the adverse transfusion reaction (ATR) of non hemolytic type still prevails. The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence and pattern of transfusion-related adverse events at our centre. The present retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Transfusion Medicine from April 2011 to April 2018, at a multi-organ transplant centre in South India. All the Adverse transfusion reactions were investigated in detail in the blood bank for the clerical errors, immunohematology workup and classified according to their nature with imputability assessment. A total of 140 ATR were reported out of 100,569 blood components distributed during the study period. After the analysis and workup of the reported reactions, majority of the reactions were observed in males (71%, n = 99). Most common symptom presented was Itching/Rashes in 43.6% (n = 61) ATR. Allergic reactions (51.4%, n = 72), were the most commonly encountered ATR followed by FNHTR (25.7%, n = 36). FFP transfusions (0.2%) contributed to the majority of the reactions followed by Red cell transfusion (0.15%). ATR were observed maximum in Hepato-biliary disease and liver transplantation patients (62%) followed by oncology patients (15%). The overall incidence of ATR in our study is 0.14% which is comparatively low compared to other studies due to well established hemovigilance systems. Adoption of more equipped methods & sensitive technology in various areas of blood banking will help to bring down the unwanted adverse transfusion reactions.

Indexed as

Allergic reactionBloodFebrileHemolyticHemovigilanceTransfusion reaction

Identifiers

PMID32158098
PMCPMC7042423
OpenAlexW2970327491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.