Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32158076›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2020

Validity and reliability of velocity measurements on ultrasonography using custom software with an optical-flow algorithm.

Tomoko Yamashita, Kohei Ozawa, Kazuyoshi Gamada

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomoko YamashitaGraduate School of Medical Technology and Health Welfare Sciences, Hiroshima International University: 555-36 Kurose-Gakuendai, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 739-2695, Japan.
Kohei OzawaMirai Links, Japan.
Kazuyoshi GamadaGraduate School of Medical Technology and Health Welfare Sciences, Hiroshima International University: 555-36 Kurose-Gakuendai, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 739-2695, Japan.
Hiroshima International University · JPMirai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] The purposes of this study were: 1) to validate a commercial software program using an optical-flow algorithm to measure the velocity of muscle movement; and 2) to determine optimal image quality and the size and location of regions of interest. [Materials and Methods] First, a block of pork thigh muscle was pulled at 33 different constant velocities. Subsequently, an accelerometer, a high-velocity camera, and ultrasonography were used to obtain measurements, and an Echolizer software was used to determine ultrasound-based velocities. Finally, the impact of the location and size of the regions of interest and the brightness and contrast of the images was analyzed. [Results] The regression equation was expressed as y=1.150 × -0.071 with a determination coefficient of 0.996. The average absolute error of the software was 0.02 mm/s, and the average relative error was 0.20% of the actual velocity between 2.5 and 16.5 mm/s after the regression equation was applied to the measured data. The accuracy of measurement was reduced owing to the increased size of the regions of interest, which included poor image quality or a deeper zone. [Conclusion] Our method of measuring muscle velocity using a custom program showed high validity and reliability. It is necessary to use the regression equation in the program to improve accuracy. However, the validity of the method could be reduced if the regions of interest involve deep tissues or areas with poor visualization of the muscle bundles, or if the brightness and contrast of the image are set inaccurately.

Indexed as

UltrasoundValidationVelocity

Identifiers

PMID32158076
PMCPMC7032980
OpenAlexW3006589365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.