Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157993›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

Biologics in Leprosy: A Systematic Review and Case Report.

Anna L Cogen, Eglantine Lebas, Barbara De Barros, James P Harnisch, William R Faber, Diana N Lockwood, Stephen L Walker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. IFN-γ-Driven macrophage responses in the immunity toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Treatment and Evaluation Advances in Leprosy Neuropathy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Infections in the era of immunobiologicals.Anais brasileiros de dermatologia
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna L CogenDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Eglantine LebasDepartment of Dermatopathology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Barbara De BarrosLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
James P HarnischDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
William R FaberDepartment of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Diana N LockwoodLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen L WalkerLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Washington · USGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors increase susceptibility to tuberculosis, but the effect of biologics on susceptibility to leprosy has not been described. Moreover, biologics may play a role in treating erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL). The objectives of this systematic review were to determine whether the development of clinical leprosy is increased in patients being treated with biologics and to assess the use of biologics in treating leprosy reactions. A systematic literature review was completed of patients with leprosy who received treatment with biologics either before or after a diagnosis of leprosy was confirmed. All studies and case reports were included for qualitative evaluation. The search yielded 10 cases (including one duplicate publication) of leprosy diagnosed after initiation of TNF-α inhibitors and four case reports of refractory ENL successfully treated with infliximab or etanercept. An unpublished case of persistent ENL responsive to infliximab is also presented. These data demonstrate that the use of TNF-α inhibitors may be a risk factor for developing leprosy or reactivating subclinical infections. Leprosy can present with skin lesions and arthritis, so leprosy should be considered in patients presenting with these signs before starting treatment with these agents. Leprosy should be considered in patients who develop worsening eruptions and neurologic symptoms during treatment with TNF-α inhibitors. Finally, TNF-α inhibitors appear effective in some cases of refractory ENL.

Indexed as

AdultBiological ProductsHumansInfliximabLeprostatic AgentsLeprosyMaleTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaBiological ProductsInfliximabLeprostatic AgentsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID32157993
PMCPMC7204592
OpenAlexW3011477932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.