Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157987›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2020

Community-care unit model of residential mental health rehabilitation services in Queensland, Australia: predicting outcomes of consumers 1-year post discharge.

S Parker, U Arnautovska, D Siskind, F Dark, G McKeon, N Korman, M Harris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S ParkerMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-3981
U ArnautovskaPA Foundation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, BrisbaneAustralia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7780-8441
D SiskindMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-9216
F DarkMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8776-207X
G McKeonMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3462-2775
N KormanMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, Australia.
M HarrisUniversity of Queensland, School of Public Health, Herston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0096-729X
The University of Queensland · AUMetro South Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCommunity care units (CCUs) are a model of residential psychiatric rehabilitation aiming to improve the independence and community functioning of people with severe and persistent mental illness. This study examined factors predicting improvement in outcomes among CCU consumers.

methodsHierarchical regression using data from a retrospective cohort (N = 501) of all consumers admitted to five CCUs in Queensland, Australia between 2005 and 2014. The primary outcome was changed in mental health and social functioning (Health of the Nation Outcome Scale). Secondary outcomes were disability (Life Skills Profile-16), service use, accommodation instability, and involuntary treatment. Potential predictors covered service, consumer, and treatment characteristics. Group-level and individualised change were assessed between the year pre-admission and post-discharge. Where relevant and available, the reliable and clinically significant (RCS) change was assessed by comparison with a normative sample.

resultsGroup-level analyses showed statistically significant improvements in mental health and social functioning, and reductions in psychiatry-related bed-days, emergency department (ED) presentations and involuntary treatment. There were no significant changes in disability or accommodation instability. A total of 54.7% of consumers demonstrated reliable improvement in mental health and social functioning, and 43.0% showed RCS improvement. The majority (60.6%) showed a reliable improvement in psychiatry-related bed-use; a minority demonstrated reliable improvement in ED presentations (12.5%). Significant predictors of improvement included variables related to the CCU care (e.g. episode duration), consumer characteristics (e.g. primary diagnosis) and treatment variables (e.g. psychiatry-related bed-days pre-admission). Higher baseline impairment in mental health and social functioning (β = 1.12) and longer episodes of CCU care (β = 1.03) increased the likelihood of RCS improvement in mental health and social functioning.

conclusionsCCU care was followed by reliable improvements in relevant outcomes for many consumers. Consumers with poorer mental health and social functioning, and a longer episode of CCU care were more likely to make RCS improvements in mental health and social functioning.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health CentersCommunity Mental Health ServicesHumansMental DisordersPsychiatric RehabilitationResidential TreatmentRetrospective StudiesOutcomerehabilitationschizophreniasevere and persistent mental illness

Identifiers

PMID32157987
PMCPMC7214525
OpenAlexW3012445643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.