Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157801›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2020

Stimuli-Responsive Particle-Based Amphiphiles as Active Colloids Prepared by Anisotropic Click Chemistry.

Cornelia Lanz, Moritz Schlötter, Nele Klinkenberg, Patricia Besirske, Sebastian Polarz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cornelia LanzDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Moritz SchlötterDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Nele KlinkenbergDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Patricia BesirskeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Sebastian PolarzDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1651-4906
University of Konstanz · DELeibniz University Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphiphiles alter the energy of surfaces, but the extent of this feature is typically constant. Smart systems with amphiphilicity as a function of an external, physical trigger are desirable. As a trigger, the exposure to a magnetic field, in particular, is attractive because it is not shielded in water. Amphiphiles like surfactants are well known, but the magnetic response of molecules is typically weak. Vice-versa, magnetic particles with strong response to magnetic triggers are fully established in nanoscience, but they are not amphiphilic. In this work colloids with Janus architecture and ultra-small dimensions (25 nm) have been prepared by spatial control over the thiol-yne click modification of organosilica-magnetite core-shell nanoparticles. The amphiphilic properties of these anisotropically modified particles are proven. Finally, a pronounced and reversible change in interfacial stabilization results from the application of a weak (<1 T) magnetic field.

Indexed as

active colloidscore-shell structuresJanus nanoparticlesmagnetite nanoparticlessmart materials

Identifiers

PMID32157801
PMCPMC7318572
OpenAlexW3012000145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.