ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2021
Proteomic Modulation in the Dorsal Spinal Cord Following Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy in an In Vivo Neuropathic Pain Model.
Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Review
- Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Management: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Functional Ultrasound Imaging Reveals Activation Properties of Clinical Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy Programming.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Deciphering pain: molecular mechanisms and neurochemical pathways-challenges and future opportunities.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Insights into nervous system repair from the fruit fly.Neuronal signaling · 2022Review
- Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Hypothesized Mechanisms of Action.The journal of pain · 2022Review
- Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Changes of MAPK-Related Inflammatory Response in an Animal Model of Neuropathic Pain by Differential Target Multiplexed SCS and Low-Rate SCS.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- Proteomic analysis of spinal cord tissue in a rat model of cancer-induced bone pain.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Article
- A New Direction for Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation: Combining Contemporary Therapy Paradigms with Evoked Compound Action Potential Sensing.Journal of pain research · 2021Article
- Modulation of Glia-Mediated Processes by Spinal Cord Stimulation in Animal Models of Neuropathic Pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Current Perspectives on Neurostimulation for the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2021Review
- Spinal Cord Stimulation Enhances Microglial Activation in the Spinal Cord of Nerve-Injured Rats.Neuroscience bulletin · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides relief for patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain although its mechanism may not be as dependent on electrical interference as classically considered. Recent evidence has been growing regarding molecular changes that are induced by SCS as being a key player in reversing the pain process. Here, we observed the effect of SCS on altering protein expression in spinal cord tissue using a proteomic analysis approach.
methodsA microlead was epidurally implanted following induction of an animal neuropathic pain model. After the model was established, stimulation was applied for 72 hours continuously followed by tissue collection and proteomic analysis via tandem mass spectroscopy. Identified proteins were run through online data bases for protein identification and classification of biological processes.
resultsA significant improvement in mechanical sensitivity was observed following 48 hours of SCS therapy. Proteomic analysis identified 5840 proteins, of which 155 were significantly affected by SCS. Gene ontology data bases indicated that a significant number of proteins were associated to stress response, oxidation/reduction, or extracellular matrix pathways. Additionally, many of the proteins identified also play a role in neuron-glial interactions and are involved in nociception.
conclusionsThe development of an injury unbalances the proteome of the local neural tissue, neurons, and glial cells, and shifts the proteomic profile to a pain producing state. This study demonstrates the reversal of the injury-induced proteomic state by applying conventional SCS therapy. Additional studies looking at variations in electrical parameters are needed to optimize SCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.