Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157770›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2021

Proteomic Modulation in the Dorsal Spinal Cord Following Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy in an In Vivo Neuropathic Pain Model.

Dana M Tilley, Christopher B Lietz, David L Cedeno, Courtney A Kelley, Lingjun Li, Ricardo Vallejo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dana M TilleyLumbrera LLC, Bloomington, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1884-1927
Christopher B LietzCelgene Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA.
David L CedenoLumbrera LLC, Bloomington, IL, USA.
Courtney A KelleyLumbrera LLC, Bloomington, IL, USA.
Lingjun LiUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Ricardo VallejoLumbrera LLC, Bloomington, IL, USA.
MacroGenics (United States) · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

TR&D 2 Metabolic Labels for Ultraplexed Protein Quantification p. 453P41GM108538 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COON, JOSHUA J · 2016 to 2025
$13.1M
Mass Spectrometric Studies of Neuropeptides in FeedingR01DK071801 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LINGJUN LI · 2006 to 2026
$6.7M
Acquisition of a High-Field Dual Source FTICR-MS for Pharmaceutical ResearchS10RR029531 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LI, LINGJUN · 2011 to 2011
$2.1M
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029531NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071801NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM108538NIH HHS 1R01DK071801NIH HHS P41GM108538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides relief for patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain although its mechanism may not be as dependent on electrical interference as classically considered. Recent evidence has been growing regarding molecular changes that are induced by SCS as being a key player in reversing the pain process. Here, we observed the effect of SCS on altering protein expression in spinal cord tissue using a proteomic analysis approach.

methodsA microlead was epidurally implanted following induction of an animal neuropathic pain model. After the model was established, stimulation was applied for 72 hours continuously followed by tissue collection and proteomic analysis via tandem mass spectroscopy. Identified proteins were run through online data bases for protein identification and classification of biological processes.

resultsA significant improvement in mechanical sensitivity was observed following 48 hours of SCS therapy. Proteomic analysis identified 5840 proteins, of which 155 were significantly affected by SCS. Gene ontology data bases indicated that a significant number of proteins were associated to stress response, oxidation/reduction, or extracellular matrix pathways. Additionally, many of the proteins identified also play a role in neuron-glial interactions and are involved in nociception.

conclusionsThe development of an injury unbalances the proteome of the local neural tissue, neurons, and glial cells, and shifts the proteomic profile to a pain producing state. This study demonstrates the reversal of the injury-induced proteomic state by applying conventional SCS therapy. Additional studies looking at variations in electrical parameters are needed to optimize SCS.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaSpinal Cord StimulationAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansProteomicsSpinal CordLow-frequency electrical stimulationneuropathic painprotein expressionproteomicsspared nerve injury modelspinal cord stimulationtandem mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID32157770
PMCPMC7484326
OpenAlexW3012185270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.