Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157673›Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2021

Efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam in patients with intellectual disability and epilepsy.

Ruby M E Gillis, Elisabeth A Wammes-van der Heijden, Helenius J Schelhaas, In Y Tan, Dederieke A M Festen, Marian H J M Majoie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Brivaracetam use in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus on its role as first add-on therapy in focal epilepsy and beyond.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruby M E GillisDepartment of Residential Care, Epilepsy Center Kempenhaeghe, Postbus 61, 5590 AB, Heeze, The Netherlands. r.gillis@erasmusmc.nl.
Elisabeth A Wammes-van der HeijdenDepartment of Pharmacy, Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Postbus 61, 5590 AB, Heeze, The Netherlands.
Helenius J SchelhaasDepartment of Neurology, Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Postbus 61, 5590 AB, Heeze, The Netherlands.
In Y TanDepartment of Residential Care, Epilepsy Center Kempenhaeghe, Postbus 61, 5590 AB, Heeze, The Netherlands.
Dederieke A M FestenDepartment of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marian H J M MajoieDepartment of Neurology, Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Postbus 61, 5590 AB, Heeze, The Netherlands.
Kempenhaeghe · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with intellectual disability (ID) are often excluded from clinical trials, and little is known about the best approach to treat their epilepsy. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) for adjunctive treatment in patients with focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. We analyzed the efficacy and tolerability of BRV in patients with ID and epilepsy who either had or had not previously received treatment with levetiracetam (LEV). Data on efficacy and tolerability were retrospectively collected. After the initial start of BRV in our tertiary epilepsy center, we analyzed medical records at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. 116 patients were included (mean age = 34.9 years, 44% female). All had complete data of 3-month follow-up, 76 of 6-month follow-up, and 39 patients of 1-year follow-up. Median starting dose of BRV was 50.0 mg/day and the mean number of concomitant AEDs was 2.6. Seizure reduction and no side effects were reported in more than half of all patients. The most reported side effects were somnolence, dizziness and aggression. Retention rates for BRV were 84.4%, 75.5% and 58.1% after 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Seizure reduction and side effects did not differ significantly between the groups with or without previous LEV treatment. We demonstrate that BRV is effective and well tolerated in patients with epilepsy and ID, even in those where previous LEV treatment failed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnticonvulsantsChildDizzinessEpilepsyFatigueFemaleHeadacheHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMiddle AgedPyrrolidinonesRetrospective StudiesAnticonvulsantsbrivaracetamPyrrolidinonesBrivaracetamEfficacyEpilepsyIntellectual disabilitySide effects

Identifiers

PMID32157673
OpenAlexW3011775057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.