Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157660›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2020

The Effect of Food Composition and Behavior on Neurobiological Response to Food: a Review of Recent Research.

Eliza L Gordon, Michelle R Lent, Lisa J Merlo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The ecological validity of the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 and momentary food addiction symptoms.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eliza L GordonDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100165, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0165, USA.
Michelle R LentSchool of Professional and Applied Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Rowland Hall 532a, 4190 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19131, USA.
Lisa J MerloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine, McKnight Brain Institute, L4-100K, PO Box 100256, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. lmerlo@ufl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewControversy surrounds the construct of food addiction. The current review examines neurobiological evidence for the existence of food addiction as a valid diagnosis. RECENT

findingsRecent neuroimaging studies suggest significant overlap in the areas of the brain that are activated in relation to both food and drug addiction. Specifically, areas of the brain implicated in executive functioning (e.g., attention, planning, decision-making, inhibition), pleasure and the experience of reward, and sensory input and motor functioning display increased activation among individuals with symptoms of both food and drug addiction. Proposed symptoms of food addiction mirror those comprising other substance use disorder diagnoses, with similar psychological and behavioral sequelae. Results of neuroimaging studies suggest significant overlap in the areas of the brain that are activated in relation to both food and drug addiction, providing support for continued research into the construct of food addiction.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingAdolescentAdultBehavior, AddictiveBrainChildElectroencephalographyExecutive FunctionFemaleFood AddictionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeurobiologyPleasurePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAddictive disordersBinge eatingCompulsive eatingCravingEating behaviorFood addictionHighly palatable foodsHighly processed foodsNeurobiological effectsNeuroimagingNutritionReward

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.