SynthesisJournal of applied genetics2020
Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of applied genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Central Precocious Puberty in Williams Syndrome: Two Cases Illustrating Diagnostic Challenges and Individualized Management.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Case report: Development of central precocious puberty in a girl with late-diagnosed simple virilizing congenital adrenal hyperplasia complicated with Williams syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- A Large Turkish Cohort of Williams Syndrome: The Evaluation of Facial, Cardiovascular, and Neuropsychiatric Features.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Early Neurobehavioral Characterization of the CD Mouse Model of Williams-Beuren Syndrome.Cells · 2023Article
- Clinical phenotypes study of 231 children with Williams syndrome in China: A single-center retrospective study.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022Article
- Atypical deletion of Williams-Beuren syndrome reveals the mechanism of neurodevelopmental disorders.BMC medical genomics · 2022Article
- Williams syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021Review
- Article
- Brazilian growth charts for Williams-Beuren Syndrome at ages 2 to 18 years.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is a rare genetic disease caused by a sporadic heterozygous microdeletion in 7q11.23. It is characterized by distinctive facial appearance, cardiopathy, short stature, intellectual disability, and endocrine abnormalities. To evaluate the growth pattern of patients with WBS and to identify the prevalence of malnutrition, overweight, and obesity in this population, a systematic review of studies published in English, between 1987 and 2018, was performed following the PRISMA protocol using the PubMed, Cochrane, and BIREME databases. Original articles and articles that evaluated growth status using weight, or height, or head circumference (HC), or body mass index (BMI) of individuals with WBS were included. Case reports, articles with data from other syndromes, and articles that did not present as a central theme the evaluation of growth were not included. WBS presented specific growth pattern, characterized by intrauterine growth restriction, low weight, length, and HC at birth. This global growth delay persisted during childhood and adolescence. BMI was not different to the reference population, and obesity was not observed in childhood. The mechanisms that determine this typical growth pattern are not totally clear; however, the typical pubertal development of these patients and the intrinsic and secondary lesions caused by microdeletion at 7q11.23 seem to be the major factors involved. Conclusion: Patients with WBS have a growth pattern different from the general reference population. The reference charts for normal population should not be used for WBS patients because it often underestimate their growth. Specific growth charts for WBS patients are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.