ArticleEndocrine pathology2020
Frequency and Role of CDKN2A Deletion in High-Risk Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Grading and staging for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The 2022 WHO classification of tumors of the pituitary gland: An update on aggressive and metastatic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The emerging role of Fusobacteria in carcinogenesis.European journal of clinical investigation · 2024Review
- Therapeutic response to pazopanib: case report and literature review on molecular abnormalities of aggressive prolactinomas.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Genomics and Epigenomics of Pituitary Tumors: What Do Pathologists Need to Know?Endocrine pathology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The underlying mechanisms of aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (pitNETs) are still unclear. The p16 protein, encoded by the CDKN2A tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 9p21, is commonly reported to be lost in numerous types of cancer. For this reason, this study examined to examine the status of homozygous deletion of CDKN2A in high-risk pitNETs. Thirty-eight high-risk pitNETs (30 male, 8 female) were analyzed for CDKN2A deletion by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Demographic characteristics such as sex, patient age at operation, and sellar magnetic resonance imaging findings including tumor size and invasion status were recorded. The frequency of CDKN2A homozygous deletion by FISH was 3/38 (7.89%) in the high-risk pitNET group. All of these three cases with CDKN2A homozygous deletion were invasive densely granulated lactotroph tumors (p = 0.000). CDKN2A deletion was not correlated with patient age, sex, cavernous sinus invasion (CSI), and tumor size (p > 0.05). The Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly correlated with CDKN2A homozygous deletion (p = 0.003). The mean Ki-67 proliferation index was 10.7% in pitNETs with CDKN2A homozygous deletion and the Ki-67 proliferation index in the whole study group was 4.1%. CSI was significantly correlated with the morphofunctional tumor types including lactotroph tumor, invasive null cell tumor, and invasive gonadotroph tumor (p = 0.021). These findings suggest a close correlation between inactivation of p16 gene and invasive lactotroph tumors. Further investigations are needed to expand on the mechanism of p16 (CDKN2A) gene deletion in high-risk pitNETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.