ArticleJournal of community health2020
Predictors of Tick Exposure Risk-Reduction Behavior in Indiana.
Article in Journal of community health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Tick-Borne Diseases in a Non-Lyme-Endemic County in Southeastern Ohio: Results from a Cross-Sectional Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Personal protection measures to prevent tick bites in the United States: Knowledge gaps, challenges, and opportunities.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2022Review
- Tick-Borne Surveillance Patterns in Perceived Non-Endemic Geographic Areas: Human Tick Encounters and Disease Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Tick trails: the role of online recreational trail reviews in identifying risk factors and behavioral recommendations associated with tick encounters in Indiana.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Relationship Between Tick Activity, Tick-Borne Diseases, Cognitive and Affective Risk Assessment in Peri-domestic Areas.Journal of community health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify significant predictors of the adoption of more than one tick-exposure and tick-borne disease risk reduction behavior among a cross-section of Indiana residents. Study participants were recruited through quota sampling, before completing an online self-administered questionnaire in Qualtrics. The most adopted tick exposure risk reduction behavior (TERRB) (was 'Walking on established trails and avoiding contact with adjacent vegetation' (83%, n = 2418). This was followed by 'Conducting a thorough check of clothing and the body soon after returning from the outdoors' (81%, n = 2373). The two least adopted TERRBs were,' Treating outdoor clothing with special insect repellent (e.g. Permethrin)' (48%, n = 1409) and 'Wearing appropriate clothing' ('Tucking shirt into pants, and the pants into socks when outdoors') respectively (52%, n = 1524). Study participants who engaged in residential tick control practices (i.e. 'three-foot wide barrier of wood chips/gravel between lawn and woodland', 'yard pesticide application', 'shrub & tree-branch trimming', 'yard fencing', 'fixed time lawn mowing', and 'leaf litter removal') were significantly more likely to adopt nearly all the assessed TERRBs. Higher scores on TERRB efficacy index were associated with engaging in multiple TERRBs. Higher degree of worry about safety/health because of ticks was also associated with adoption of multiple TERRBs. In conclusion, increased risk perceptions, among Indiana residents is significantly associated with adoption of multiple TERRBs. Identifying the predictors of the adoption of more than one TERRB is vital for the prevention of tick-borne diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32157640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.