Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157524›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020

The Impact of Primary Tumor Surgery on Survival in HER2 Positive Stage IV Breast Cancer Patients in the Current Era of Targeted Therapy.

Ross Mudgway, Carlos Chavez de Paz Villanueva, Ann C Lin, Maheswari Senthil, Carlos A Garberoglio, Sharon S Lum

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Breast Reconstruction in De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Timing, the Treatment, the Question: Comparison of Epidemiologic Approaches to Minimize Immortal Time Bias in Real-World Data Using a Surgical Oncology Example.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ross MudgwayDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Carlos Chavez de Paz VillanuevaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Ann C LinDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Maheswari SenthilDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Carlos A GarberoglioDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Sharon S LumDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA. slum@llu.edu.
Loma Linda University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to examine the impact of primary tumor resection on survival in HER2+ stage IV breast cancer patients in the era of HER2 targeted therapy.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with HER2+ stage IV breast cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2012 comparing those who did and did not undergo definitive breast surgery.

resultsOf 3231 patients, treatment included primary site surgery in 35.0%; chemo/targeted therapy in 89.4%; endocrine therapy in 37.7%; and radiation in 31.8%. Surgery was associated with Medicare/other government (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03-1.81) or private insurance (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.53-2.42) versus none/Medicaid, radiation (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.76-2.51), chemo/targeted therapy (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.47-2.70), and endocrine therapy (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.40-2.14). Non-Hispanic Black versus White patients (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87) were less likely to have surgery. Overall mortality was associated with insurance (Medicare/other government versus none/Medicaid, HR 0.36, p < 0.0001), receipt of chemo/targeted therapy (HR 0.76, p = 0.008), endocrine therapy (HR 0.70, p = 0.0006), and radiation therapy (HR 1.33, p = 0.0009), NH Black versus White race/ethnicity (HR 1.39, p = 0.002), visceral versus bone-only metastases (HR 1.44, p = 0.0003), and lowest versus highest income quartile (HR 1.36, p = 0.01). Propensity score analysis showed surgery was associated with improved survival versus no surgery (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.77).

conclusionsSurgery of the primary site for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer is associated with improved overall survival in selected patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBone NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMedicareNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID32157524
OpenAlexW3010863286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.