Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157523›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Performance of Noninvasive Liver Fibrosis Scores in the Morbid Obese Patient, Same Scores but Different Thresholds.

Diego Meneses, Antonio Olveira, Ramon Corripio, María Del Carmen Méndez, Míriam Romero, Isabel Calvo-Viñuelas, Lucrecia Herranz, David Vicent, Ana Isabel de-Cos-Blanco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diego MenesesDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain. samoth67@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-0503
Antonio OlveiraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Ramon CorripioDepartment of General Surgery, Metabolic Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
María Del Carmen MéndezDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Míriam RomeroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel Calvo-ViñuelasDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Obesity Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Lucrecia HerranzDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
David VicentInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Isabel de-Cos-BlancoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Obesity Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease. It is a spectrum of progressive alterations, with the final step in liver fibrosis which carries a high burden of long-term mortality. The scores used to predict liver fibrosis are not properly validated in morbid obesity (MO). Our aim was to evaluate the performance of seven risk scores in bariatric surgery (BS) patients.

methodsCross-sectional analysis in a cohort of 60 patients with MO undergoing BS. Liver biopsy (LB) was taken and compared with fibrosis risk assessed by noninvasive scores: APRI, FIB-4, Forns, NFS (NAFLD fibrosis score), BARD, BAAT, and Hepamet. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) and measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated; performance of fibrosis scores was evaluated at standard threshold vs those suggested by ROC analysis.

resultsLB was available in 50 patients; 9 (18%) had significant fibrosis (F2-F4). The BARD and Forns scores best predicted the absence of fibrosis, both with negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.5%, with AUROC of 0.761 and 0.667, respectively. Modification of standard thresholds (2 for BARD and 6.9 for Forns) to those suggested by ROC analysis (3 and 3.6, respectively) improved performance of scores. Basal glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), aspartate transaminase (AST), and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) were identified by logistic regression analysis as independent predictor of fibrosis.

conclusionsExisting scoring systems are unable to stratify fibrosis risk in MO using established thresholds; its performance is improved if these cutoffs are modified.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseObesity, MorbidAlanine TransaminaseBiomarkersBiopsyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisROC CurveAlanine TransaminaseBiomarkersAPRIBAATBARDBariatric surgeryFIB-4Fibrosis risk scoresFornsHepametNFSNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseObesity

Identifiers

PMID32157523
OpenAlexW3011991119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.