ArticleClinical rheumatology2020
What are the rheumatology educational preferences of family medicine residents? A descriptive study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Canadian medicine faculties, an average of 2.3% of the medical curriculum is dedicated to musculoskeletal problems with a focus on orthopedic conditions. The goal of this descriptive study was to assess the educational preferences in rheumatology of family medicine residents and to identify their preferred methods of learning.
methodsFrom September 2017 to December 2017, two hundred and thirty-six first- and second-year family medicine residents from Université Laval were asked to complete an electronic anonymous survey assessing their confidence in doing different rheumatology tasks. They were also consulted on their favorite methods of learning and their preferred periods throughout their medical cursus to learn the different skills related to rheumatology.
resultsEighty-five family medicine residents completed the survey. The residents were rather confident when evaluating mono-arthritis but less confident for oligo/polyarthritis and even less confident with connective tissue diseases. The family medicine residents mentioned preferring traditional lecture classes and clinical cases. They wanted to learn the majority of rheumatology education during medical school training. As residents, they wanted only small capsules, seminars, or memory aids. Interestingly, men preferred learning rheumatology skills during the residency, whereas women preferred learning it in medical school.
conclusionThe lack of confidence of family medicine residents when evaluating systemic inflammatory diseases compared to mechanical musculoskeletal problems highlights the importance of rheumatology teaching through general medical training and through family medicine residency. Key Points • Family medicine residents are less confident when evaluating systemic inflammatory diseases than musculoskeletal disorders. • Family medicine residents prefer traditional lecture classes and clinical cases. • Family medicine residents prefer learning rheumatology during medical school training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.