Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157423›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020

Development of LepReact, a defined skin test for paucibacillary leprosy and low-level M. leprae infection.

Malcolm S Duthie, Maria T Pena, Amit P Khandhar, Alessandro Picone, Zachary MacMIllen, Richard W Truman, Linda B Adams, Steven G Reed

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  5. Detection and Monitoring ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malcolm S DuthieHost Directed Therapeutics (HDT) Biocorp, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA. malcolm.duthie@hdtbiocorp.com.
Maria T PenaNational Hansens Disease Program, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Amit P KhandharInfectious Disease Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alessandro PiconeInfectious Disease Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Zachary MacMIllenInfectious Disease Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Richard W TrumanLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Linda B AdamsNational Hansens Disease Program, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Steven G ReedHost Directed Therapeutics (HDT) Biocorp, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA.
Infectious Disease Research Institute · USNational Hansen's Disease Program · USLouisiana State University · US

Funding

NIH HHS HHSN272201800019CU.S. Department of Health and Human Services AAI15006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistence of new leprosy cases in endemic areas such as India, Brazil, Bangladesh, and the Philippines has encouraged studies of chemoprophylaxis among contacts of patients. Epidemiological screening tools to enable early detection of infected individuals in endemic populations would be critical to target individuals most in need of intervention. Despite decades of attempts, however, there still are no tests available for the early detection of low-level infection with Mycobacterium leprae. In this report, we describe the development of a leprosy skin test using M. leprae-specific antigens. We selected the chimeric LID-1 fusion protein, formulated to achieve maximum performance at a minimal dose, as a skin test candidate based on its ability to elicit delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions in M. leprae immune guinea pigs in a sensitive and specific manner, i.e., with no cross-reactivity observed with other mycobacterial species. Importantly, evaluations in armadillos indicated that intradermal inoculation of formulated LID-1 could distinguish uninfected from M. leprae-infected animals manifesting with symptoms distinctly similar to the PB presentation of patients. Together, our data provide strong proof-of-concept for developing an antigen-specific skin test to detect low-level M. leprae infection. Such a test could, when applied with appropriate use of chemo- and/or immunoprophylaxis, be instrumental in altering the evolution of clinical disease and M. leprae transmission, thus furthering the objective of zero leprosy.

Indexed as

Hypersensitivity, DelayedAnimalsAntigens, BacterialArmadillosBacterial ProteinsEarly DiagnosisFemaleGuinea PigsInjections, IntradermalLeprosy, PaucibacillaryMycobacterium lepraeProof of Concept StudySkinSkin TestsAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsArmadilloDelayed-type hypersensitivityGuinea pigLeprosySkin test

Identifiers

PMID32157423
OpenAlexW3011754230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.