Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157409›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2020

ADC as a predictor of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leticia Maffazzioli, Mariana B Zilio, Alexandre L Klamt, Juliana A Duarte, Guilherme S Mazzini, Vinicius J Campos, Marcio F Chedid, Richard R Gurski

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leticia MaffazzioliDivision of Radiology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, 2nd Floor, Porto Alegre, 90035-903, Brazil. lemaff@gmail.com.
Mariana B ZilioPost-Graduation Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alexandre L KlamtPost-Graduation Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Juliana A DuarteDivision of Radiology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, 2nd Floor, Porto Alegre, 90035-903, Brazil.
Guilherme S MazziniDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Vinicius J CamposPost-Graduation Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Marcio F ChedidPost-Graduation Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Richard R GurskiPost-Graduation Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is part of clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a predictor of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy (nCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC).

methodsThe MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched for studies using ADC to evaluate response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with EC. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated with the QUADAS tool. Data from eligible studies were extracted and evaluated by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed comparing mean ADC values between responders and non-responders to nCRT in three different scenarios: baseline (BL) absolute values; percent change between intermediate (IM) values and BL; and percent change between final follow-up (FU) value and baseline BL.

resultsSeven studies (n = 158 patients) were included. Responders exhibited a statistically significant percent increase in ADC during nCRT (mean difference [MD] 21.06%, 95%CI = 13.04-29.09; I

conclusionThese results suggest that ADC can be used as a predictor of pathologic response, with a statistically significant association between percent ADC increase during and after treatment and pCR. ADC may serve as a tool to help in guiding clinical decisions. KEY POINTS: • DWI is routinely included in MRI oncological protocols. • ADC can be used as a predictor of pathologic response, with a statistically significant association between percent ADC increase during and after treatment and pCR.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment OutcomeChemoradiotherapyDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingEsophageal neoplasmsNeoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.