ArticleScientific reports2020
Machine learning for characterizing risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a rural Chinese population: the Henan Rural Cohort Study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence in type 2 diabetes prediction: a comprehensive 33-year bibliometric and literature analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Explainable machine learning for long-term cardiovascular disease risk prediction in Chinese middle-aged and older adults: a 9-year longitudinal cohort study with web-based risk calculator.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Leveraging natural language processing and machine learning to identify chronic conditions from primary care electronic medical records.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Model for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Based on Feature Selection from Fatty Acids, Amino Acids, and Clinical Characteristics.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Machine learning models for predicting new-onset diabetes following acute pancreatitis using real-world data.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Application of generalized linear mixed effects random forest for identifying risk factors of prediabetes in Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Type 2 Diabetes Prediction Model in China: A Five-Year Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Transfer learning prediction of type 2 diabetes with unpaired clinical and genetic data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multimodal machine learning-based marker enables the link between obesity-related indices and future stroke: a prospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Pathways to chronic disease detection and prediction: Mapping the potential of machine learning to the pathophysiological processes while navigating ethical challenges.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Diabetes Prediction Through Linkage of Causal Discovery and Inference Model with Machine Learning Models.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- SHAP-enhanced machine learning identifies modifiable obesity predictors across adolescent weight groups: A 2021 YRBSS analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Improving T2D machine learning-based prediction accuracy with SNPs and younger age.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Disease Management for Aging Populations: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning and NLP Applications.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of One-Year Readmission in HFrEF Patients: The Key Role of Inflammation.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
- Automated sample annotation for diabetes mellitus in healthcare integrated biobanking.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Secure and privacy-preserving automated machine learning operations into end-to-end integrated IoT-edge-artificial intelligence-blockchain monitoring system for diabetes mellitus prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- [Development of a fall prediction model for community-dwelling older adults in South Korea using machine learning: a secondary data analysis].Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of data mining, machine learning offers opportunities to improve discrimination by analyzing complex interactions among massive variables. To test the ability of machine learning algorithms for predicting risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a rural Chinese population, we focus on a total of 36,652 eligible participants from the Henan Rural Cohort Study. Risk assessment models for T2DM were developed using six machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), classification and regression tree (CART), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and gradient boosting machine (GBM). The model performance was measured in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under precision recall curve. The importance of variables was identified based on each classifier and the shapley additive explanations approach. Using all available variables, all models for predicting risk of T2DM demonstrated strong predictive performance, with AUCs ranging between 0.811 and 0.872 using laboratory data and from 0.767 to 0.817 without laboratory data. Among them, the GBM model performed best (AUC: 0.872 with laboratory data and 0.817 without laboratory data). Performance of models plateaued when introduced 30 variables to each model except CART model. Among the top-10 variables across all methods were sweet flavor, urine glucose, age, heart rate, creatinine, waist circumference, uric acid, pulse pressure, insulin, and hypertension. New important risk factors (urinary indicators, sweet flavor) were not found in previous risk prediction methods, but determined by machine learning in our study. Through the results, machine learning methods showed competence in predicting risk of T2DM, leading to greater insights on disease risk factors with no priori assumption of causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.