Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32156798›Full record

ArticlemSystems2020

Complementary Metagenomic Approaches Improve Reconstruction of Microbial Diversity in a Forest Soil.

L V Alteio, F Schulz, R Seshadri, N Varghese, W Rodriguez-Reillo, E Ryan, D Goudeau, S A Eichorst, R R Malmstrom, R M Bowers and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. How genomics can help unravel the evolution of endophytic fungi.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

L V AlteioGraduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
F SchulzDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-4677
R SeshadriDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
N VargheseDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
W Rodriguez-ReilloGraduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
E RyanDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
D GoudeauDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
S A EichorstCentre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9017-7461
R R MalmstromDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
R M BowersDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
L A KatzGraduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9138-4702
J L BlanchardDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
T WoykeDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA twoyke@lbl.gov.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-5637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil ecosystems harbor diverse microorganisms and yet remain only partially characterized as neither single-cell sequencing nor whole-community sequencing offers a complete picture of these complex communities. Thus, the genetic and metabolic potential of this "uncultivated majority" remains underexplored. To address these challenges, we applied a pooled-cell-sorting-based mini-metagenomics approach and compared the results to bulk metagenomics. Informatic binning of these data produced 200 mini-metagenome assembled genomes (sorted-MAGs) and 29 bulk metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs). The sorted and bulk MAGs increased the known phylogenetic diversity of soil taxa by 7.2% with respect to the Joint Genome Institute IMG/M database and showed clade-specific sequence recruitment patterns across diverse terrestrial soil metagenomes. Additionally, sorted-MAGs expanded the rare biosphere not captured through MAGs from bulk sequences, exemplified through phylogenetic and functional analyses of members of the phylum

Indexed as

flow cytometrymetagenomicsmicrobial ecologysoil microbiology

Identifiers

PMID32156798
PMCPMC7065516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.