Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32156763›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Development and usability testing of HEARTPA♀N: protocol for a mixed methods strategy to develop an integrated smartphone and web-based intervention for women with cardiac pain.

Monica Parry, Abida Dhukai, Hance Clarke, Ann Kristin Bjørnnes, Joseph A Cafazzo, Lynn Cooper, Paula Harvey, Joel Katz, Chitra Lalloo, Marit Leegaard and 20 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03800082 (Development and Usability Testing of a Progressive WebApp for Women With Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03800082 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Development and Usability Testing of a Progressive WebApp for Women With Heart Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2021 to 2022Enrolled98ConditionsPain, Cardiac Ischemia, Women, Pain, ChronicArmsat heart (changed from HEARTPA♀N during usability testing)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.

Monica ParryUniversity of Toronto Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, Toronto, Ontario, Canada monica.parry@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6941-1380
Abida DhukaiUniversity of Toronto Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hance ClarkePain Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Kristin BjørnnesDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5356-3873
Joseph A CafazzoUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lynn CooperPatient Advisor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paula HarveyUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joel KatzFaculty of Health - Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chitra LallooThe Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marit LeegaardInstitute of Nursing, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Akershus, Norway.
France LégaréMédecine Familiale, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Mike LovasHealthcare Human Factors, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Judith McFetridge-DurdleCollege of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Michael McGillionFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Colleen NorrisFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Laura ParenteHealthcare Human Factors, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rose PattersonAnishnawbe Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Louise PiloteMedicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Leah PinkWasser Pain Management Centre, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer PriceWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer StinsonThe Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Akib UddinHealthcare Human Factors, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Charles VictorUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Judy Watt-WatsonLawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carol AuldPatient Advisor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christine FaubertPatient Advisor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Deborah ParkPatient Advisor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marianne ParkPatient Advisor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Beatrice RickardPatient Advisor, Moose Factory, Ontario, Canada.
Vincenza Spiteri DeBonisPatient Advisor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marymount University · USUniversity Health Network · CABloomberg (United States) · USOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOUniversity of Toronto · CACentre for Global Health Research · CAFaculty of Public Health · GBFlorida State University · USMcGill University · CAPain Management Institute · USUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAWomen's College Hospital · CAYork University · CA

Funding

CIHR 389044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMore women experience cardiac pain related to coronary artery disease and cardiac procedures compared with men. The overall goal of this programme of research is to develop an integrated smartphone and web-based intervention (HEARTPA♀N) to help women recognise and self-manage cardiac pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines the mixed methods strategy used for the development of the HEARTPA♀N content/core feature set (phase 2A), usability testing (phase 2B) and evaluation with a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) (phase 3). We are using the individual and family self-management theory, mobile device functionality and pervasive information architecture of mHealth interventions, and following a sequential phased approach recommended by the Medical Research Council to develop HEARTPA♀N. The phase 3 pilot RCT will enable us to refine the prototype, inform the methodology and calculate the sample size for a larger multisite RCT (phase 4, future work). Patient partners have been actively involved in setting the HEARTPA♀N research agenda, including defining patient-reported outcome measures for the pilot RCT: pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). As such, the guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (SPIRIT-PRO) are used to report the protocol for the pilot RCT (phase 3). Quantitative data (eg, demographic and clinical information) will be summarised using descriptive statistics (phases 2AB and 3) and a content analysis will be used to identify themes (phase 2AB). A process evaluation will be used to assess the feasibility of the implementation of the intervention and a preliminary efficacy evaluation will be undertaken focusing on the outcomes of pain and HRQoL (phase 3). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Toronto (36415; 26 November 2018). We will disseminate knowledge of HEARTPA♀N through publication, conference presentation and national public forums (Café Scientifique), and through fact sheets, tweets and webinars. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03800082.

Indexed as

Angina PectorisInternet-Based InterventionSmartphoneTelemedicineAdultCanadaCase-Control StudiesClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccoronary heart diseasecoronary interventionpain managementpatient reported outcomesself-managementwomen

Identifiers

PMID32156763
PMCPMC7064127
OpenAlexW3011605763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.