ArticleClinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology2020
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Hearing Prognosis in Unilateral Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Article in Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of machine learning-based predictive models for evaluating risk in the contralateral ear among patients with unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Harnessing Machine Learning for Personalized Care of Patients With Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- Differentially expressed exosome miRNA profiles as putative prognostic biomarkers for profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning model for prognosis prediction in sudden sensorineural hearing loss under integrated therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Innovations in Hearing Health: A Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Audiology and Hearing Technologies.Current aging science · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in otorhinolaryngology: current trends and application areas.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Review
- Research on noise-induced hearing loss based on functional and structural MRI using machine learning methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applications of Machine Learning in Meniere's Disease Assessment Based on Pure-Tone Audiometry.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Development of a machine learning model for prognostic prediction of severe sudden sensorineural hearing loss with hyperbaric oxygen therapy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Evaluating Prediction Models with Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly in Chronic Otitis Media Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prediction of hearing recovery with deep learning algorithm in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Recovery with Patient-Personalized Seigel's Criteria Using Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Hearing Recovery Prediction for Patients with Chronic Otitis Media Who Underwent Canal-Wall-Down Mastoidectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The inflammatory and metabolic status of patients with sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Nomogram for predicting the prognosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients based on clinical characteristics: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Differentially expressed miRNA profiles of serum-derived exosomes in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- NcRNA: key and potential in hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Prediction of hearing recovery in unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss using artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Association of sudden sensorineural hearing loss with asthma: a longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort.BMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPrognosticating idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is an important challenge. In our study, a dataset was split into training and test sets and cross-validation was implemented on the training set, thereby determining the hyperparameters for machine learning models with high test accuracy and low bias. The effectiveness of the following five machine learning models for predicting the hearing prognosis in patients with ISSNHL after 1 month of treatment was assessed: adaptive boosting, K-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM).
methodsThe medical records of 523 patients with ISSNHL admitted to Korea University Ansan Hospital between January 2010 and October 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. In this study, we analyzed data from 227 patients (recovery, 106; no recovery, 121) after excluding those with missing data. To determine risk factors, statistical hypothesis tests (e.g., the two-sample t-test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables) were conducted to compare patients who did or did not recover. Variables were selected using an RF model depending on two criteria (mean decreases in the Gini index and accuracy).
resultsThe SVM model using selected predictors achieved both the highest accuracy (75.36%) and the highest F-score (0.74) on the test set. The RF model with selected variables demonstrated the second-highest accuracy (73.91%) and F-score (0.74). The RF model with the original variables showed the same accuracy (73.91%) as that of the RF model with selected variables, but a lower F-score (0.73). All the tested models, except RF, demonstrated better performance after variable selection based on RF.
conclusionThe SVM model with selected predictors was the best-performing of the tested prediction models. The RF model with selected predictors was the second-best model. Therefore, machine learning models can be used to predict hearing recovery in patients with ISSNHL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.