Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32155707›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Abrogation of IFN-γ Signaling May not Worsen Sensitivity to PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade.

Julie Vackova, Adrianna Piatakova, Ingrid Polakova, Michal Smahel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie VackovaDepartment of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, 252 50 Vestec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3860-7460
Adrianna PiatakovaDepartment of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, 252 50 Vestec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-8357
Ingrid PolakovaDepartment of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, 252 50 Vestec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-0924
Michal SmahelDepartment of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, 252 50 Vestec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0366-4932
Charles University · CZ

Funding

European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000785European Regional Development Fund CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109European Regional Development Fund CZ.1.05/2.1.00/19.0395European Regional Development Fund CZ.1.05/2.1.00/19.0400Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 988218Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LM2018126Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LQ1604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade is a promising therapy for various cancer types, but most patients are still resistant. Therefore, a larger number of predictive biomarkers is necessary. In this study, we assessed whether a loss-of-function mutation of the interferon (IFN)-γ receptor 1 (IFNGR1) in tumor cells can interfere with anti-PD-L1 therapy. For this purpose, we used the mouse oncogenic TC-1 cell line expressing PD-L1 and major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules and its TC-1/A9 clone with reversibly downregulated PD-L1 and MHC-I expression. Using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, we generated cells with deactivated IFNGR1 (TC-1/dIfngr1 and TC-1/A9/dIfngr1). In tumors, IFNGR1 deactivation did not lead to PD-L1 or MHC-I reduction on tumor cells. From potential inducers, mainly IFN-α and IFN-β enhanced PD-L1 and MHC-I expression on TC-1/dIfngr1 and TC-1/A9/dIfngr1 cells in vitro. Neutralization of the IFN-α/IFN-β receptor confirmed the effect of these cytokines in vivo. Combined immunotherapy with PD-L1 blockade and DNA vaccination showed that IFNGR1 deactivation did not reduce tumor sensitivity to anti-PD-L1. Thus, the impairment of IFN-γ signaling may not be sufficient for PD-L1 and MHC-I reduction on tumor cells and resistance to PD-L1 blockade, and thus should not be used as a single predictive marker for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 cancer therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCell Line, TransformedFemaleImmunotherapyInterferon-gammaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeoplasms, ExperimentalProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCd274 protein, mouseInterferon-gammaPdcd1 protein, mouseProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorcancerIFNGR1IFN-αIFN-βimmune checkpoint therapyMHC class IPD-1/PD-L1

Identifiers

PMID32155707
PMCPMC7084912
OpenAlexW3009220048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.