Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32155300›Full record

ArticleCancer science2020

Circulating Epstein-Barr virus microRNAs BART7-3p and BART13-3p as novel biomarkers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Tianzhu Lu, Qiaojuan Guo, Keyu Lin, Honglin Chen, Yixin Chen, Yuanji Xu, Cheng Lin, Ying Su, Yan Chen, Mengyuan Chen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Mapping Research on miRNAs in Cancer: A Global Data Analysis and Bibliometric Profiling Analysis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tianzhu LuThe School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1524-7909
Qiaojuan GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Keyu LinDepartment of Radiation Biology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Honglin ChenState Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yixin ChenNational Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yuanji XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Cheng LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ying SuDepartment of Radiation Biology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yan ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Mengyuan ChenNational Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yuhong ZhengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yunbin YeLaboratory of Immuno-Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Shaojun LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jingfeng ZongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jianji PanThe School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3211-7874

Funding

Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2019J01194, 2019Y0061, 2019J05140Joint Funds for the innovation of Science and Technology of Fujian province 2018Y9109, 2018Y9114National Natural Science Foundation of China U1405221, 81972717, U1705282Science and Technology Program of Fujian Province 2018Y2003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) BamHI A rightward transcripts (BART) encoded microRNAs (EBV-miR-BARTs) are abnormally highly expressed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aims to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of miR-BART7-3p and miR-BART13-3p. Plasma levels of EBV DNA, miR-BART7-3p, and miR-BART13-3p were examined by quantitative PCR in 483 treatment-naïve NPC patients and 243 controls without NPC. The prognostic performance was examined by comparing plasma levels with rates of distant metastasis during follow-up. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing NPC was 0.926 for EBV DNA, 0.964 for plasma miR-BART7-3p, 0.973 for miR-BART13-3p, and 0.997 for all three indices. Among 465 NPC patients without distant metastasis, the above-median miR-BART7-3p and EBV DNA were independent risk for shorter distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-5.97, P = .003; HR = 2.27, 95% CI, 1.26-4.10, P = .006) in multivariate Cox regression. Epstein-Barr virus DNA, miR-BART7-3p, and miR-BART13-3p after radiotherapy were detectable in 28.6%, 17.6%, and 54.7% of patients, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression, detectable miR-BART7-3p and EBV DNA were independent risks for shorter DMFS (HR = 4.13, 95% CI, 1.89-9.01, P < .001; HR = 2.14, 95% CI, 1.04-4.42, P = .039). The 4-year DMFS rate was 92.0% in subjects (n = 156) with neither detectable miR-BART7-3p nor EBV DNA, 80.0% in subjects (n = 65) with either detectable miR-BART7-3p or EBV DNA, and 52.9% in subjects (n = 24) with both detectable miR-BART7-3p and EBV DNA after radiotherapy (P < .001). Circulating levels of miR-BART7-3p and miR-BART13-3p show excellent diagnostic performance for NPC. The combination of plasma levels of miR-BART7-3p and EBV DNA at diagnosis and after radiotherapy could help stratify patients by risk of poor DMFS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNADNA, ViralFemaleHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsPrognosisRNA, ViralSurvival AnalysisYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNADNA, ViralRNA, ViralbiomarkerEpstein-Barr virusmetastasismicroRNAnasopharyngeal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32155300
PMCPMC7226202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.